Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30287910›Full record

ArticleThe pharmacogenomics journal2019

Pharmacogenomics in epithelial ovarian cancer first-line treatment outcome: validation of GWAS-associated NRG3 rs1649942 and BRE rs7572644 variants in an independent cohort.

Ricardo Pinto, Joana Assis, Augusto Nogueira, Carina Pereira, Sara Coelho, Mariana Brandão, João Dias, Sara Alves, Deolinda Pereira, Rui Medeiros

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Biomedicines · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ricardo PintoMolecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group-Research Center, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Porto, Portugal.
Joana AssisMolecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group-Research Center, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Porto, Portugal.
Augusto NogueiraMolecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group-Research Center, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Porto, Portugal.
Carina PereiraMolecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group-Research Center, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Porto, Portugal.
Sara CoelhoOncology Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Porto, Portugal.
Mariana BrandãoOncology Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Porto, Portugal.
João DiasOncology Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Porto, Portugal.
Sara AlvesOncology Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Porto, Portugal.
Deolinda PereiraOncology Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Porto, Portugal.
Rui MedeirosMolecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group-Research Center, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Porto, Portugal. ruimedei@ipoporto.min-saude.pt.
Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PTCentre for Health Technology and Services Research · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation) SFRH/BD/124155/2016Ministry of Education and Science | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation) SFRH/BD/98536/2013Ministry of Education and Science | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation) SFRH/BPD/114803/2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of predictive biomarkers for the first-line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains a challenge. Although genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several genetic polymorphisms as predictors of EOC clinical outcome, the subsequent validation has not yet been performed. This study aims to validate the influence of Neuregulin 3 (NRG3) rs1649942 and Brain and reproductive organ-expressed (TNFRSF1A modulator) (BRE) rs7572644 GWAS-identified variants in an independent cohort of EOC patients from the North region of Portugal (n = 339) submitted to first-line treatment. Polymorphism genotypes were determined by real-time PCR using validated assays. Patients carrying the NRG3 rs1649942 A allele presented a significantly longer overall survival (OS) when compared to GG-genotype patients (log-rank test, P = 0.011) in the FIGO IV stage subgroup. No impact was observed for early-stage patients or considering disease-free survival (DFS) as an outcome. For FIGO I/II stage patients, BRE rs7572644 C allele carriers exhibit a decreased OS (P = 0.014) and DFS (P = 0.032) when compared to TT-homozygous patients. Furthermore, a Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed a three-fold increase in the risk of death (HR, 3.09; P = 0.015) and recurrence (HR, 3.33; P = 0.009) for FIGO I/II C allele carriers. No significant impact was observed for late-stage patients. The BRE rs7572644 and NRG3 rs1649942 genetic variants were validated in an independent cohort of EOC Portuguese patients, particularly in specific subgroups considering FIGO staging. Further functional post-GWAS analyses are indispensable to understand the biological mechanisms underlying the observed results.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuregulinsPharmacogeneticsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBABAM2 protein, humanNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuregulinsNRG3 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID30287910
OpenAlexW2895112345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.