Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30287902›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Repurposing of promoters and enhancers during mammalian evolution.

Francesco N Carelli, Angélica Liechti, Jean Halbert, Maria Warnefors, Henrik Kaessmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emergence Biases in Molecular Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Repurposing Cell Cycle Oscillators for Multiciliated Cell Differentiation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Mutational scans reveal differential evolvability ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesco N CarelliCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. fr.carelli@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4280-4923
Angélica LiechtiCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean HalbertCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Maria WarneforsCenter for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH), DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Henrik KaessmannCenter for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH), DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany. h.kaessmann@zmbh.uni-heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Lausanne · CHThe Gurdon Institute · GB

Funding

EC | European Research Council (ERC) 615253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Promoters and enhancers-key controllers of gene expression-have long been distinguished from each other based on their function. However, recent work suggested that common architectural and functional features might have facilitated the conversion of one type of element into the other during evolution. Here, based on cross-mammalian analyses of epigenome and transcriptome data, we provide support for this hypothesis by detecting 445 regulatory elements with signatures of activity turnover (termed P/E elements). Most events represent transformations of putative ancestral enhancers into promoters, leading to the emergence of species-specific transcribed loci or 5' exons. Distinct GC sequence compositions and stabilizing 5' splicing (U1) regulatory motif patterns may have predisposed P/E elements to regulatory repurposing, and changes in the U1 and polyadenylation signal densities and distributions likely drove the evolutionary activity switches. Our work suggests that regulatory repurposing facilitated regulatory innovation and the origination of new genes and exons during evolution.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticEvolution, MolecularPromoter Regions, GeneticAnimalsPrimatesRodentia

Identifiers

PMID30287902
PMCPMC6172195
OpenAlexW2892647771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.