ArticleSpinal cord2018
Correction: Evidence-based scientific exercise guidelines for adults with spinal cord injury: an update and a new guideline.
Article in Spinal cord, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tele-exercise and spinal cord injury: Effects on physical activity, strength, and quality of life.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2024Review
- Defining accelerometer cut-points for different intensity levels in motor-complete spinal cord injury.Spinal cord · 2020Article
- Outcome Measures of Free-Living Activity in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Authors Victoria L. Goosey-Tolfrey and Karen M. Smith were listed under the incorrect affiliations at the time of publication.
Identifiers
30287872What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.