Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30287868›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Continuous theta-burst stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex inhibits improvement on a working memory task.

Teodóra Vékony, Viola Luca Németh, Adrienn Holczer, Krisztián Kocsis, Zsigmond Tamás Kincses, László Vécsei, Anita Must

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04864080 (Transdiagnostic Cognitive Biomarkers), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04864080 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Transdiagnostic Cognitive Biomarkers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2022 to 2027Enrolled45ConditionsPain, DepressionArmsComputer game/task, Health surveys online
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Synaptic plasticity and mental health: methods, challenges and opportunities.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Spinal cord representation of motor cortex plasticity reflects corticospinal tract LTP.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Teodóra VékonyDepartment of Neurology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary. vekony.teodora@med.u-szeged.hu.
Viola Luca NémethDepartment of Neurology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Adrienn HolczerDepartment of Neurology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Krisztián KocsisDepartment of Neurology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Zsigmond Tamás KincsesDepartment of Neurology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
László VécseiDepartment of Neurology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Anita MustMTA-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group, Szeged, Hungary. must.anita@med.u-szeged.hu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) may be more effective for modulating cortical excitability compared to standard repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. However, the impact of intermittent (iTBS) and continuous TBS (cTBS) on working memory (WM) is poorly studied. The aim of our study was to compare the effects of iTBS and cTBS on WM over the left and right DLPFC. iTBS, cTBS or sham stimulation was administered over the right and left hemisphere of fifty-one healthy human subjects. WM was assessed before and after TBS using the 1-back, 2-back, and 3-back tasks. We found classical practice effects in the iTBS and the sham group: WM performance improved following stimulation as measured by the discriminability index. However, this effect could not be observed in the cTBS group. We did not find any hemisphere-dependent effects, suggesting that the practice effect is not lateralized, and TBS affects WM performance in a comparable manner if administered either over the left or the right hemisphere. We propose that our findings represent a useful addition to the literature of TBS-induced effects on WM. Moreover, these results indicate the possibility of clarifying processes underlying WM performance changes by using non-invasive brain stimulation.

Indexed as

Theta RhythmAdultFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermPrefrontal CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30287868
PMCPMC6172210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.