Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30287766›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2018

Effect of Educational Interventions on Understanding and Use of Nutrition Labels: A Systematic Review.

Sally G Moore, Judy K Donnelly, Steve Jones, Janet E Cade

Abstract readEvaluation StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nutrition facts, drug facts, and model facts: putting AI ethics into practice in gun violence research.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sally G MooreSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. Sallygmoore@hotmail.com.
Judy K DonnellySchool of Health and Social Sciences, Leeds Trinity University, Leeds LS18 5HD, UK. judykdonnelly@gmail.com.
Steve JonesSchool of Health and Social Sciences, Leeds Trinity University, Leeds LS18 5HD, UK. st.jones@leedstrinity.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1281-5210
Janet E CadeSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. J.e.cade@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3421-0121

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L02019X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential for nutrition labels to impact on population health is dependent on consumer ability to understand and use this information. Consumer understanding of this information varies across sociodemographic groups and with different label design formats. Labeling legislation requires consumer education on how to use nutrition labels, and recent mandatory changes to the Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP) are underway to improve comprehensibility. This review aimed to evaluate if educational programs can improve understanding and use of nutrition labels. Database searches were performed to identify interventions which delivered education on nutrition labels with outcomes measuring aspects of comprehension or use. A total of 17 studies were selected for review, including nine randomized and eight cohort studies. The majority of studies were conducted in the United States Study participants included school aged children, older adults, and those with diabetes within a range of intervention types involving taught sessions or web-based education. Whilst outcome measures were heterogenous, all studies reported a statistically significant improvement in one or more outcomes of participant understanding or use of nutrition labels. Aspects such as general nutrition knowledge, health literacy, and program delivery format warrant attention in future research. Education which optimizes comprehension and use of nutrition labels may have the potential to improve the impact of this information on dietary health.

Indexed as

ComprehensionConsumer BehaviorDietFood LabelingHealth BehaviorHealth EducationHealth LiteracyFeeding BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansProgram EvaluationUnited Statesfood labelshealth literacynutrition educationnutrition facts label comprehensionnutrition facts label utilizationnutrition knowledgenutrition labels

Identifiers

PMID30287766
PMCPMC6213388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.