Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30287679›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2018

Recurrent back pain during working life and exit from paid employment: a 28-year follow-up of the Whitehall II Study.

Tea Lallukka, Minna Mänty, Cyrus Cooper, Maria Fleischmann, Anne Kouvonen, Karen E Walker-Bone, Jenny A Head, Jaana I Halonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A biopsychosocial approach assessing pain indicators among Black men.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Recurrent pain and work disability: a record linkage study.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tea LallukkaPopulation and Work Ability Program, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3841-3129
Minna MäntyDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Cyrus CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Maria FleischmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
Anne KouvonenFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6997-8312
Karen E Walker-BoneArthritis Research UK/MRC Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jenny A HeadDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
Jaana I HalonenPopulation and Work Ability Program, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1142-0388

Funding

Socio-economic status and heterogeneity in agingR01AG013196 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF LONDON INST OF NEUROLOGY · PI MARMOT, MICHAEL G, SINGH-MANOUX, ARCHANA · 1996 to 2013
$3.5M
Socioeconomic gradient in CHD in early old ageR01HL036310 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LONDON · PI KIVIMAKI, MIKA J, MARMOT, MICHAEL G · 1986 to 2012
$3.1M
British Heart Foundation RG/13/2/30098Department of Health 10/33/04Medical Research Council ES/L002892/1Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council G0601019Medical Research Council G0902037Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585823Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/2Medical Research Council MR/K013351/1Medical Research Council MR/K023241/1Medical Research Council MR/R024227/1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL036310NIA NIH HHS R01 AG013196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the impact of recurrent, as compared with single, reports of back pain on exit from paid employment over decades of follow-up.

methodsThe study sample was from the British Whitehall II Study cohort (n=8665, 69% men, aged 35-55 at baseline), who had provided information about their reports of back pain between 1985 and 1994. Data about exit from paid employment (health-related and non-health related exit, unemployment and other exit) were collected between 1995 and 2013. Repeated measures logistic regression models were fitted to examine the associations, and adjust for covariates.

resultsRecurrent pain was reported by 18% of participants, while 26% reported pain on an occasion and 56% did not report pain. Report of back pain on an occasion was not associated with health-related job exit, whereas recurrent pain was associated with such an exit (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.99), when compared with those who did not report pain. These associations were somewhat stronger among middle-grade and lower-grade employees, while these associations were not seen among higher-grade employees. Differences in associations by age and psychosocial working conditions were small.

conclusionsThese results highlight the need for early detection of recurrent back pain to prevent exit out of paid employment for health reasons. As the risk varies by occupational grade, this emphasises the importance of identification of high-risk groups and finding ways to address their modifiable risk factors.

Indexed as

AdultBack PainEmploymentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsLondonMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecurrenceRetirementRisk FactorsSick Leaveback disordersemployment transitionsepidemiologyoccupational cohortpain

Identifiers

PMID30287679
PMCPMC6227793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.