Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30287668›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2018

Smoking as a risk factor for lung cancer in women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Linda M O'Keeffe, Gemma Taylor, Rachel R Huxley, Paul Mitchell, Mark Woodward, Sanne A E Peters

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Association between second-hand smoke exposure and lung cancer risk in never-smokers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Tobacco Smoking and Risk of Second Primary Lung Cancer.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  8. Smoking and risk of sleep-related issues: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2020
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Sex-specific associations of the bilirubin-to-albumin ratio with lung cancer risk: evidence from Cox regression and causal survival forest analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Linda M O'Keeffe *MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Gemma Taylor *MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2185-0162
Rachel R HuxleyCollege of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Paul MitchellOlivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health and Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Mark WoodwardThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sanne A E PetersThe George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 21330Cancer Research UK C56067/A21330Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/5Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/2Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/6Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/9Medical Research Council MR/M014509/1Medical Research Council MR/P014550/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the sex-specific association between smoking and lung cancer.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed and EMBASE from 1 January 1999 to 15 April 2016 for cohort studies. Cohort studies before 1 January 1999 were retrieved from a previous meta-analysis. Individual participant data from three sources were also available to supplement analyses of published literature. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Cohort studies reporting the sex-specific relative risk (RR) of lung cancer associated with smoking.

resultsData from 29 studies representing 99 cohort studies, 7 million individuals and >50 000 incident lung cancer cases were included. The sex-specific RRs and their ratio comparing women with men were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis with inverse-variance weighting. The pooled multiple-adjusted lung cancer RR was 6.99 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 5.09 to 9.59) in women and 7.33 (95% CI 4.90 to 10.96) in men. The pooled ratio of the RRs was 0.92 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.16; I

conclusionsSmoking yields similar risks of lung cancer in women compared with men. However, these data may underestimate the true risks of lung cancer among women, as the smoking epidemic has not yet reached full maturity in women. Continued efforts to measure the sex-specific association of smoking and lung cancer are required.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleRisk FactorsSex FactorsSmokinglung cancersex-specificsmokingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30287668
PMCPMC6194454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.