Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30287532›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2018

Childbirth and Early Newborn Care Practices in 4 Provinces in China: A Comparison With WHO Recommendations.

Tao Xu, Qing Yue, Yan Wang, John Murray, Howard Sobel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Stillbirths in China: a nationwide survey.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tao XuNational Center for Women and Children's Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China. xutao6622@163.com.
Qing YueNational Center for Women and Children's Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Yan WangNational Center for Women and Children's Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
John MurrayReproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Health through Life-Course, World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines.
Howard SobelReproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Health through Life-Course, World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAs a part of the process of implementing Early Essential Newborn Care (EENC) in China, which are evidence-based interventions recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), we sought to understand whether current hospital policies are consistent with WHO-recommended standards and what factors influence their use. Data from the study will help inform policy changes needed to support the introduction of evidence-based childbirth and early newborn care practices effectively and to inform further scale up of EENC nationwide.

methodsTen randomly selected hospitals in 4 early-introducing provinces participated in the study. We collected data from 20 simulated delivery scenario observations and focus group discussions and individual interviews with 10 hospital management staff. Policies, protocols, and guidelines related to childbirth and newborn care practice were also collected and reviewed at each hospital. Additionally, a survey was emailed to 15 childbirth and newborn experts from the 4 selected provinces and completed by 13. Data were compared with WHO EENC evidence-based standards to calculate the agreement rates. Barriers to introducing evidence-based guidelines were identified in focus groups and key informant interviews, then combined into common categories.

findingsHospital policies were not consistent with WHO recommendations in 10 (59%) of the 17 delivery and early newborn care practices. Delayed cord clamping was recommended by 30% of hospital protocols and prolonged skin-to-skin contact by 13%, neither of which were observed in the delivery simulations. Kangaroo mother care (KMC) for stable preterm babies was required in only 17% of the hospitals; no preterm babies had KMC initiated, with all immediately separated from their mothers and admitted to neonatal intensive care units. Newborn resuscitation equipment was required to be placed within 2 meters of the delivery bed in 84% of hospital protocols, but was prepared in only 40% of cases. Immediate drying after birth was required in 48% of hospital protocols, but was initiated in only 20% of observed cases.

conclusionsCurrent childbirth and early newborn care policy and practice in China is not aligned with WHO recommendations for some major interventions. To make it easier and safer for hospital workers to practice EENC, expert working groups and national policies must be established to address inconsistencies and cultural beliefs and provide a strong, evidence-based set of guidelines for hospitals and health workers to follow.

Indexed as

Health PolicyParturitionPractice Guidelines as TopicWorld Health OrganizationChinaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfant CareInfant, NewbornPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID30287532
PMCPMC6172112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.