ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2018
Immunoglobulin use in immune deficiency in the UK: a report of the UKPID and National Immunoglobulin Databases.
Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementing calculated globulin screening for immunodeficiencies: The benefits and challenges.Journal of human immunity · 2026Review
- Pharmacokinetic modelling of intravenous immunoglobulin in children with primary immunodeficiencies and secondary antibody deficiencies.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Quality of life of X-linked agammaglobulinemia patients in the United Kingdom.Journal of human immunity · 2026Article
- Understanding supply sustainability of plasma-derived medicinal products: Drivers and consequences of shortages.Vox sanguinis · 2025Review
- Article
- Cost Utility of Lifelong Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy vs Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant to Treat Agammaglobulinemia.JAMA pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Supply of immunoglobulin in the UK faces pressures due to increasing demand, cost and variable supply. This paper describes immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT) in primary immunodeficiency (PID) and secondary immunodeficiency (SID) to assist in the ongoing planning of UK immunoglobulin provision. A retrospective analysis of the National Immunoglobulin Database and the UKPID registry was carried out. In total, 3,222 patients are registered as receiving IGRT for immunodeficiencies. Predominately antibody disorders made up the largest diagnostic category (61% of patients). The total cost of IGRT for immunodeficiency for 2015/16 was £40,673,350; an average annual cost of £1,099,254 per centre and £12,124 per PID patient. SCIg accounted for 43.8% and 50.1% of IGRT, with home therapy accounting for 42.7% and 57.5% of place of therapy in the National Immunoglobulin Database and UKPID registry respectively. In 2015/16 use of immunoglobulin in SID increased by 24% over the previous financial year. The overall trends of increasing demand in immunology are mirrored in other specialties, most notably neurology and haematology. These data are the first national overview of IGRT for immunodeficiencies, providing a valuable resource for clinicians and policy makers in the ongoing management of UK immunoglobulin supply.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.