ReviewThe EMBO journal2018
Right time, right place-DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints collectively safeguard S phase.
Review in The EMBO journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Rfa1-MN-based system reveals new factors involved in the rescue of broken replication forks.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Stabilization of expandable DNA repeats by the replication factor Mcm10 promotes cell viability.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Dynamics of DNA damage-induced nuclear inclusions are regulated by SUMOylation of Btn2.Nature communications · 2024Article
- The MCM2-7 Complex: Roles beyond DNA Unwinding.Biology · 2024Review
- The multi-functionality of UHRF1: epigenome maintenance and preservation of genome integrity.Nucleic acids research · 2021Review
- DDR Inc., one business, two associates.Current genetics · 2019Review
- On the Interplay of the DNA Replication Program and the Intra-S Phase Checkpoint Pathway.Genes · 2019Review
- Homologous Recombination: To Fork and Beyond.Genes · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.