Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30287264›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2018

The Change in Nursing Home Residents' Preferences Over Time.

Katherine M Abbott, Allison R Heid, Morton Kleban, Michael J Rovine, Kimberly Van Haitsma

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Examining Engagement Calendar Deviations in Assisted Living: A Focus on Residents With Dementia.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine M AbbottDepartment of Sociology and Gerontology, Scripps Gerontology Center, Miami University, Oxford, OH. Electronic address: abbottkm@miamioh.edu.
Allison R HeidIndependent Research Consultant, Ardmore, PA.
Morton KlebanThe Polisher Research Institute at The Madlyn and Leonard Abramson Center for Jewish Life, North Wales, PA.
Michael J RovineGraduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Kimberly Van HaitsmaThe Polisher Research Institute at The Madlyn and Leonard Abramson Center for Jewish Life, North Wales, PA; The Pennsylvania State University, College of Nursing, University Park, PA.

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
Assessing preferences for everyday living in the nursing home: reliability and coR21NR011334 · NINR · POLISHER RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VANHAITSMA, KIMBERLY S · 2011 to 2012
$448k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NINR NIH HHS R21 NR011334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNursing home (NH) residents' preferences for everyday living are the foundation for delivering individualized person-centered care. Yet, work has not examined what the most and least important preferences of nursing home residents are and if those preferences change over time.

designThis study examined the change in nursing home residents' (n = 255) preferences for everyday living over a 3-month period. Participants were recruited from 28 NHs in the suburbs of a major metropolitan East Coast area of the United States. MEASURES: Residents were interviewed face-to-face using the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory-Nursing Home version at baseline (T1) and 3 months later (T2). Change was analyzed in 2 ways: (1) percentage exact agreement (eg, respondent stated "very important" at both time points) and (2) percentage of preferences that remained either important or not important between T1 and T2.

resultsSixteen preferences were rated as very or somewhat important by 90% or more of NH residents. With regard to the stability of preference ratings, findings demonstrate an average exact agreement of 59%, and an average important versus not important agreement of 82%. In addition, 68 of the 72 preferences had 70% or higher stability over time. In other words, the preference either remained "important" or "not important" to the NH resident 3 months later. Preferences in the domain of enlisting others in care had the least amount of change. CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS: This study highlights the most important everyday living preferences of NH residents and provides assurance to care providers that the majority of preferences assessed via the PELI are both important to NH residents and stable over time. Preference-based care plans can be designed and used over a 3-month period with confidence by providers.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingNursing HomesPatient-Centered CarePatient PreferenceAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleUnited Stateseveryday preferencesnursing home residentsPerson-centered care

Identifiers

PMID30287264
PMCPMC6252281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.