Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30287182›Full record

ArticleSurgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery2018

Factors associated with bariatric surgery utilization among eligible candidates: who drops out?

Rafael Alvarez, Niki Matusko, Amanda L Stricklen, Rachel Ross, Colleen M Buda, Oliver A Varban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comment on: Life during "lockdown": a cautionary tale of the impact of environment on access to bariatric surgery.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Improving obesity treatment through telemedicine: increasing access to bariatric surgery.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Impact of insurance plan design on bariatric surgery utilization.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rafael AlvarezDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: rafalv@med.umich.edu.
Niki MatuskoDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Amanda L StricklenMichigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Rachel RossMichigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Colleen M BudaDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Oliver A VarbanDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

Obesity Surgery Scientist Training ProgramT32DK108740 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Justin Brigham Dimick, RANDY J SEELEY · 2016 to 2026
$2.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK108740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBariatric surgery is underutilized.

objectivesTo identify factors associated with eligible patient dropout from bariatric surgery.

settingUniversity hospital, United States.

methodsEligible candidates were identified after a multidisciplinary review committee (MRC) of all patients (n = 484) who attended a bariatric surgery informational session (BIS) at a single-center academic institution in 2015. We compared patients who underwent surgery within 2 years of BIS with those who did not (i.e., dropped out) by evaluating patient, insurance, and program-specific variables. Univariate analyses and multivariable regressions were performed to identify factors associated with patient dropout among eligible candidates.

resultsWe identified 307 (63%) patients who underwent MRC. Thirty-three (11%) patients were deemed poor candidates and surgery was not recommended. Among eligible candidates, 82 (30%) dropped out from the program. Factors independently associated with eligible patient dropout included coronary artery disease (odds ratio [OR] .13 [.02-.66]; P = .014), hypertension (OR .46 [.24-.87]; P = .017), time from BIS to MRC (OR .99 [.99-.99]; P = .002), 3 months of medically supervised weight loss documentation (OR .09 [.02-.51]; P = .007), endocrinology clearance (OR .26 [.09-.76]; P = .014), hematology clearance (OR .37 [.14-.95]; P = .039), urine drug screen testing (OR .31 [.13-.72]; P = .006), additional psychological evaluation (OR .43 [.20-.93]; P = .031), and required extra sessions with the dietician (OR .39 [.17-.92]; P = .032). Thirty-three (6.8%) patients underwent surgery at another institution, and 42% of these patients lived more than 50 miles from attended BIS site.

conclusionsTwenty-seven percent of patients did not undergo bariatric surgery at their initial site of evaluation despite being considered eligible candidates after MRC. Dropout was independently associated with patient, insurance, and program-specific variables that may represent barriers to care amenable to improvement.

Indexed as

AdultBariatric SurgeryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient DropoutsRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesBariatric program requirementsBariatric surgeryFailure to progress to bariatric surgeryInsurance requirementsPatient characteristicsPatient dropout

Identifiers

PMID30287182
PMCPMC6294658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.