ArticleDevelopmental biology2019
Multiple inputs into a posterior-specific regulatory network in the Ciona notochord.
Article in Developmental biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fine-Tuned Expression of Evolutionarily Conserved Signaling Molecules in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Cellular remodeling and JAK inhibition promote zygotic gene expression in the Ciona germline.EMBO reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Single-cell analysis of cell fate bifurcation in the chordate Ciona.BMC biology · 2021Article
- Brachyury controlsDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2021Article
- Quantitative Dissection of the ProximalFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Ciona Brachyury proximal and distal enhancers have different FGF dose-response relationships.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- The notochord gene regulatory network in chordate evolution: Conservation and divergence from Ciona to vertebrates.Current topics in developmental biology · 2020Review
- A deep dive into the development of sea squirts.Nature · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The gene regulatory networks underlying Ciona notochord fate specification and differentiation have been extensively investigated, but the regulatory basis for regionalized expression within the notochord is not understood. Here we identify three notochord-expressed genes, C11.331, C12.115 and C8.891, with strongly enriched expression in the secondary notochord cells at the posterior tip of the tail. C11.331 and C12.115 share a distinctive expression pattern that is highly enriched in the secondary notochord lineage but also graded within that lineage with the strongest expression at the posterior tip. Both genes show similar responses to pharmacological perturbations of Wnt and FGF signaling, consistent with an important role for Wnt and FGF ligands expressed at the tail tip. Reporter analysis indicates that the C11.331 cis-regulatory regions are extensively distributed, with multiple non-overlapping regions conferring posterior notochord-enriched expression. Fine-scale analysis of a minimal cis-regulatory module identifies discrete positive and negative elements including a strong silencer. Truncation of the silencer region leads to increased expression in the primary notochord, indicating that C11.331 expression is influenced by putative regulators of primary versus secondary notochord fate. The minimal CRM contains predicted ETS, GATA, LMX and Myb sites, all of which lead to reduced expression in secondary notochord when mutated. These results show that the posterior-enriched notochord expression of C11.331 depends on multiple inputs, including Wnt and FGF signals from the tip of the tail, multiple notochord-specific regulators, and yet-to-be identified regulators of regional identity within the notochord.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.