Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30286749›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Two decades of antenatal and delivery care in Uganda: a cross-sectional study using Demographic and Health Surveys.

Lenka Benova, Mardieh L Dennis, Isabelle L Lange, Oona M R Campbell, Peter Waiswa, Manon Haemmerli, Yolanda Fernandez, Kate Kerber, Joy E Lawn, Andreia Costa Santos and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Lenka BenovaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. Lenka.Benova@lshtm.ac.uk.
Mardieh L DennisLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Isabelle L LangeLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Oona M R CampbellLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Peter WaiswaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, P.O Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Manon HaemmerliLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Yolanda FernandezLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Kate KerberSaving Newborn Lives, Save the Children, 899 North Capitol Street, Suite 900, Washington, DC, 20002, USA.
Joy E LawnLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Andreia Costa SantosLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Fred MatovuSchool of Economics, Makerere University Kampala, Uganda and Policy Analysis & Development Research Institute (PADRI), Kampala, Uganda.
David MacleodLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Catherine GoodmanLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Loveday Penn-KekanaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Freddie SsengoobaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, P.O Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Caroline A LynchLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUganda halved its maternal mortality to 343/100,000 live births between 1990 and 2015, but did not meet the Millennium Development Goal 5. Skilled, timely and good quality antenatal (ANC) and delivery care can prevent the majority of maternal/newborn deaths and stillbirths. We examine coverage, equity, sector of provision and content of ANC and delivery care between 1991 and 2011.

methodsWe conducted a repeated cross-sectional study using four Uganda Demographic and Health Surveys (1995, 2000, 2006 and 2011).Using the most recent live birth and adjusting for survey sampling, we estimated percentage and absolute number of births with ANC (any and 4+ visits), facility delivery, caesarean sections and complete maternal care. We assessed socio-economic differentials in these indicators by wealth, education, urban/rural residence, and geographic zone on the 1995 and 2011 surveys. We estimated the proportions of ANC and delivery care provided by the public and private (for-profit and not-for-profit) sectors, and compared content of ANC and delivery care between sectors. Statistical significance of differences were evaluated using chi-square tests.

resultsCoverage with any ANC remained high over the study period (> 90% since 2001) but was of insufficient frequency; < 50% of women who received any ANC reported 4+ visits. Facility-based delivery care increased slowly, reaching 58% in 2011. While significant inequalities in coverage by wealth, education, residence and geographic zone remained, coverage improved for all indicators among the lowest socio-economic groups of women over time. The private sector market share declined over time to 14% of ANC and 25% of delivery care in 2011. Only 10% of women with 4+ ANC visits and 13% of women delivering in facilities received all measured care components.

conclusionsThe Ugandan health system had to cope with more than 30,000 additional births annually between 1991 and 2011. The majority of women in Uganda accessed ANC, but this contact did not result in care of sufficient frequency, content, and continuum of care (facility delivery). Providers in both sectors require quality improvements. Achieving universal health coverage and maternal/newborn SDGs in Uganda requires prioritising poor, less educated and rural women despite competing priorities for financial and human resources.

Indexed as

AdultCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricDelivery of Health CareFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal Health ServicesMaternal MortalityPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CarePrivate SectorPublic SectorAntenatal careChildbirth locationContent of careDelivery careFacility deliveryMaternal healthPrivate sectorPublic sectorQuality of careSocio-economic inequalities

Identifiers

PMID30286749
PMCPMC6172797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.