Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30286718›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2018

Exploring the sensory screening experiences of nurses working in long-term care homes with residents who have dementia: a qualitative study.

Fiona Höbler, Xochil Argueta-Warden, Miriam Rodríguez-Monforte, Astrid Escrig-Pinol, Walter Wittich, Katherine S McGilton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Protocol for a Field Trial of a Hearing and Vision Support Intervention for People Living in Long-Term Care in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  3. Disability and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fiona HöblerToronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, 130 Dunn Ave, Toronto, M6K 2R7, Canada. fiona.hobler@utoronto.ca.
Xochil Argueta-WardenLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 130 Dunn Ave, Toronto, M6K 2R7, Canada.
Miriam Rodríguez-MonforteFCS Blanquerna-Universitat Ramon Llull, Carrer de Padilla, 326-332, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Astrid Escrig-PinolToronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, 130 Dunn Ave, Toronto, M6K 2R7, Canada.
Walter WittichSchool of Optometry, Université de Montréal, 3744, rue Jean-Brillant, 260-7, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1P1, Canada.
Katherine S McGiltonToronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, 130 Dunn Ave, Toronto, M6K 2R7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of vision and hearing loss is higher amongst older individuals with dementia, as well as higher in long-term care settings than in the wider community. However, the incidence of sensory impairment is underreported and often goes untreated. In this study, we aimed to understand nurses' current experiences of screening and caring for long-term care residents who have dementia and sensory impairment.

methodsAs part of a larger study on the sensory screening of long-term care residents with dementia, an environmental scan was conducted with front-line healthcare providers. We report here on the findings from the content analysis of individual, semi-structured interviews with nurses working in two long-term care homes in Southern Ontario, Canada. Twenty regulated nurses, including designated resident assessment coordinators, working full- or part-time with individuals who have dementia, participated across the two sites. All interviews were transcribed, and their contents reviewed and coded for themes by means of inductive thematic analysis.

resultsFollowing a systematic and recursive approach, three analysts identified several themes relating to: 1) the sensory screening process, 2) communication strategies, and 3) quality of life, sensory loss, and dementia. Participants reported on the strengths and limitations of screening procedures, what improvements should be made, which informal strategies are effective, and the continued professional development that is needed.

conclusionsNurses demonstrated insight into the facilitators and barriers to effective screening and care of residents with dementia and sensory impairments, and expressed the need for further education, more suitable screening tools, and formalised accountability within the screening process for vision and hearing loss in these long-term care residents.

Indexed as

AdultDelivery of Health CareDementiaFemaleHearing LossHearing TestsHumansLong-Term CareMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNursesOntarioQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeResidential FacilitiesDementiaHearing lossLong-term careNursingScreeningSensory lossVisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID30286718
PMCPMC6172849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.