Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30286301›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2018

Integrating a nationally scaled workforce of community health workers in primary care: a modelling study.

Benedict Hayhoe, Thomas E Cowling, Virimchi Pillutla, Priya Garg, Azeem Majeed, Matthew Harris

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. It's time to get serious about funding neighbourhood health care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Benedict Hayhoe1 Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2645-6191
Thomas E Cowling1 Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1524-4393
Virimchi Pillutla3 Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, VIC 3168 Australia.
Priya Garg4 School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
Azeem Majeed1 Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK.
Matthew Harris1 Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK.
Imperial College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMonash University · AUSt Mary's Hospital · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2013-06-142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo model cost and benefit of a national community health worker workforce.

designModelling exercise based on all general practices in England.

settingUnited Kingdom National Health Service Primary Care.

participantsNot applicable. DATA SOURCES: Publicly available data on general practice demographics, population density, household size, salary scales and screening and immunisation uptake.

main outcome measuresWe estimated numbers of community health workers needed, anticipated workload and likely benefits to patients.

resultsConservative modelling suggests that 110,585 community health workers would be needed to cover the general practice registered population in England, costing £2.22bn annually. Assuming community health workerss could engage with and successfully refer 20% of eligible unscreened or unimmunised individuals, an additional 753,592 cervical cancer screenings, 365,166 breast cancer screenings and 482,924 bowel cancer screenings could be expected within respective review periods. A total of 16,398 additional children annually could receive their MMR1 at 12 months and 24,716 their MMR2 at five years of age. Community health workerss would also provide home-based health promotion and lifestyle support to patients with chronic disease.

conclusionA scaled community health worker workforce integrated into primary care may be a valuable policy alternative. Pilot studies are required to establish feasibility and impact in NHS primary care.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersCost-Benefit AnalysisGeneral PracticeHealth WorkforceState MedicineAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolChronic DiseaseEnglandFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInfantMaleClinicalfamily medicinegeneral practice/family medicinehealth policynon-clinicalpublic health

Identifiers

PMID30286301
PMCPMC6295943
OpenAlexW2895350251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.