Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30286250›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of physiology2019

Lower body negative pressure to safely reduce intracranial pressure.

Lonnie G Petersen, Justin S Lawley, Alexander Lilja-Cyron, Johan C G Petersen, Erin J Howden, Satyam Sarma, William K Cornwell, Rong Zhang, Louis A Whitworth, Michael A Williams and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Lonnie G PetersenDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5155-9651
Justin S LawleyInstitute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2166-7966
Alexander Lilja-CyronDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2915-249X
Johan C G PetersenDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Erin J HowdenInstitute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Satyam SarmaInstitute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
William K CornwellInstitute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0863-1187
Rong ZhangInstitute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Louis A WhitworthUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Michael A WilliamsUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Seattle, WA, USA.
Marianne JuhlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2652-7495
Benjamin D LevineInstitute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9064-7251
Texas Health Dallas · USRigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AUThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversität Innsbruck · ATUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsDuring long-term missions, some astronauts experience structural and functional changes of the eyes and brain which resemble signs/symptoms experienced by patients with intracranial hypertension. Weightlessness prevents the normal cerebral volume and pressure 'unloading' associated with upright postures on Earth, which may be part of the cerebral and ocular pathophysiology. By placing the lower body in a negative pressure device (LBNP) that pulls fluid away from cranial compartments, we simulated effects of gravity and significantly lowered pressure within the brain parenchyma and ventricle compartments. Application of incremental LBNP demonstrated a non-linear dose-response curve, suggesting 20 mmHg LBNP as the optimal level for reducing pressure in the brain without impairing cerebral perfusion pressure. This non-invasive method of reducing pressure in the brain holds potential as a countermeasure in space as well as having treatment potential for patients on Earth with traumatic brain injury or other pathology leading to intracranial hypertension. ABSTRACT: Patients with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) exhibit neuro-ocular symptoms including headache, papilloedema and loss of vision. Some of these symptoms are also present in astronauts during and after prolonged space-flight where lack of gravitational stress prevents daily lowering of ICP associated with upright posture. Lower body negative pressure (LBNP) simulates the effects of gravity by displacing fluid caudally and we hypothesized that LBNP would lower ICP without compromising cerebral perfusion. Ten cerebrally intact volunteers were included: six ambulatory neurosurgical patients with parenchymal ICP-sensors and four former cancer patients with Ommaya-reservoirs to the frontal horn of a lateral ventricle. We applied LBNP while recording ICP and blood pressure while supine, and during simulated intracranial hypertension by 15° head-down tilt. LBNP from 0 to 50 mmHg at increments of 10 mmHg lowered ICP in a non-linear dose-dependent fashion; when supine (n = 10), ICP was decreased from 15 ± 2 mmHg to 14 ± 4, 12 ± 5, 11 ± 4, 10 ± 3 and 9 ± 4 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.0001). Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), calculated as mean arterial blood pressure at midbrain level minus ICP, was unchanged (from 70 ± 12 mmHg to 67 ± 9, 69 ± 10, 70 ± 12, 72 ± 13 and 74 ± 15 mmHg; P = 0.02). A 15° head-down tilt (n = 6) increased ICP to 26 ± 4 mmHg, while application of LBNP lowered ICP (to 21 ± 4, 20 ± 4, 18 ± 4, 17 ± 4 and 17 ± 4 mmHg; P < 0.0001) and increased CPP (P < 0.01). An LBNP of 20 mmHg may be the optimal level to lower ICP without impairing CPP to counteract spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome in astronauts. Furthermore, LBNP holds clinical potential as a safe, non-invasive method for lowering ICP and improving CPP for patients with pathologically elevated ICP on Earth.

Indexed as

Intracranial PressureLower Body Negative PressureAdultAgedBrainFemaleGravitationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostureSpace FlightTreatment OutcomeWeightlessnessYoung AdultCountermeasureGravitational PhysiologyIntracranial PressureNovel Treatment potentialSpaceflight

Identifiers

PMID30286250
PMCPMC6312426
OpenAlexW2895669392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.