Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30286238›Full record

Trial reportJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2018

Effectiveness of Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Face-to-Face Clinical Care for Treatment of Tinnitus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Eldré W Beukes, Gerhard Andersson, Peter M Allen, Vinaya Manchaiah, David M Baguley

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02665975 nacompletednot on this map

Internet-based Versus Face-to-face Clinical Care for Tinnitus: A Multi-study Randomised Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnglia Ruskin UniversityRan2016 to 2017Enrolled92ConditionsTinnitusArmsCBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus, Face-to-face clinical tinnitus care
NCT06821893 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Vagus Auricular Stimulation for Tinnitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2025 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsTinnitusArmsVibrational stimulation, Sham
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Tinnitus management by improving resilience using exposure in virtual reality: a scoping review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Eldré W BeukesDepartment of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Gerhard AnderssonDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Peter M AllenDepartment of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Vinaya ManchaiahDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas.
David M BaguleyNational Institute for Health Research, Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Anglia Ruskin University · GBKarolinska Institutet · SELamar University · USManipal Academy of Higher Education · INUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Accessible clinical care is not always available to individuals with distressing tinnitus. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy has the potential to increase access to evidence-based services that manage tinnitus. Research comparing the effectiveness of this internet-based intervention with face-to-face care is required. Objective: To evaluate whether an internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy intervention is at least as effective as established individualized face-to-face clinical care in reducing tinnitus distress and tinnitus-related difficulties. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, multicenter, 2-arm parallel group, noninferiority trial with 2-month follow-up was performed between October 4, 2016, and July 14, 2017. Invited to participate were 374 adults based in the United Kingdom who had been referred to their local tinnitus clinics because of bothersome tinnitus. The experimental group received the internet-based intervention online, and the active control group underwent the usual face-to-face tinnitus care at 1 of 3 UK-based National Health Service hospitals. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either intervention using variable permuted block sizes of 4 and 6. Of 92 participants who were randomized (46 each in the experimental and control groups), 88 participants completed the assessment immediately after intervention and 74 participants completed the follow-up assessment. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive either 8 weeks of guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy or a mean of 2 to 3 individualized face-to-face appointments in a tinnitus clinic. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a change in tinnitus distress (assessed by the Tinnitus Functional Index). Secondary assessment measures were included for insomnia, anxiety, depression, hearing disability, hyperacusis, cognitive failures, and satisfaction with life. Results: Of 92 patients overall, 55 (60%) were men with a mean (SD) age of 52.96 (12.07) years and mean (SD) tinnitus duration of 6.54 (9.25) years. The between-group difference in the Tinnitus Functional Index scores after intervention were 5.18 (95% CI, -4.17 to 14.53) at the initial assessment and 5.52 (95% CI, -4.60 to 15.61) at follow-up; both differences were within the noninferiority margin of 13 points for the lower 95% CI. For the secondary outcomes, only outcomes for insomnia fell outside the noninferiority margin, both after intervention and at follow-up, favoring internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy. Conclusions and Relevance: This is the first trial, to our knowledge, to compare an internet-based intervention with standard individualized face-to-face care for tinnitus. It revealed that both interventions are equally effective for reducing tinnitus distress and most tinnitus-related difficulties. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02665975.

Indexed as

InternetCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTinnitusTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID30286238
PMCPMC6583080
OpenAlexW2894852811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.