ArticlePLoS pathogens2018
Synthetic horsepox viruses and the continuing debate about dual use research.
Article in PLoS pathogens, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Variola Virus and Clade I Mpox Virus Differentially Modulate Cellular Responses Longitudinally in Monocytes During Infection.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Grand (meta) challenges in planetary health: environmental, social, and cognitive.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- An Adagio for Viruses, Played Out on Ancient DNA.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Review
- Monkeypox in humans: a new outbreak.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022Review
- All That We Need to Know About the Current and Past Outbreaks of Monkeypox: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2022Review
- Poxvirus Recombination.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- Review
- Elimination of COVID-19: what would it look like and is it possible?The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Article
- Motivating Proactive Biorisk Management.Health securityReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.