ArticlePloS one2018
Lung tumor segmentation methods: Impact on the uncertainty of radiomics features for non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Value of Rehabilitation Training for Children with Cerebral Palsy Diagnosed and Analyzed by Computed Tomography Imaging Information Features under Deep Learning.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Trial
- Impact of inter-reader contouring variability on textural radiomics of colorectal liver metastases.European radiology experimental · 2020Trial
- Potential of spectral imaging generated by contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT for lung cancer histopathological classification - A preliminary study.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- The influence of image selection and segmentation on the extraction of lung cancer imaging radiomics features using 3D-Slicer software.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Radiomics as a measure superior to common similarity metrics for tumor segmentation performance evaluation.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Radiomics Beyond the Hype: A Critical Evaluation Toward Oncologic Clinical Use.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Radiogenomics Map-Based Molecular and Imaging Phenotypical Characterization in Localised Prostate Cancer Using Pre-Biopsy Biparametric MR Imaging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: automatic lung and liver MRI segmentation with nnU-Net, reproducibility of pyradiomics features, and a machine learning application for the classification of liver herniation.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Radiomics-Based Classification of Tumor and Healthy Liver on Computed Tomography Images.Cancers · 2024Article
- Interobserver delineation variability of computed tomography-based radiomic features of the parotid gland.Radiation oncology journal · 2024Article
- CT radiomics based on different machine learning models for classifying gross tumor volume and normal liver tissue in hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Article
- Deep radiomic model based on the sphere-shell partition for predicting treatment response to chemotherapy in lung cancer.Translational oncology · 2023Article
- Performance of alternative manual and automated deep learning segmentation techniques for the prediction of benign and malignant lung nodules.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Automated Classification of Lung Cancer Subtypes Using Deep Learning and CT-Scan Based Radiomic Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Assessment of Variabilities in Lung-Contouring Methods on CBCT Preclinical Radiomics Outputs.Cancers · 2023Article
- Intra- and interobserver assessments of intestinal wall thickness and segmentations from transverse sections of feline abdominal ultrasound images.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2023Article
- A real-time contouring feedback tool for consensus-based contour training.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of the Artificial Intelligence Methods in Medical Imaging for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Application of nnU-Net for Automatic Segmentation of Lung Lesions on CT Images and Its Implication for Radiomic Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the uncertainty of radiomics features from contrast-enhanced breath-hold helical CT scans of non-small cell lung cancer for both manual and semi-automatic segmentation due to intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-software reliability.
methodsThree radiation oncologists manually delineated lung tumors twice from 10 CT scans using two software tools (3D-Slicer and MIM Maestro). Additionally, three observers without formal clinical training were instructed to use two semi-automatic segmentation tools, Lesion Sizing Toolkit (LSTK) and GrowCut, to delineate the same tumor volumes. The accuracy of the semi-automatic contours was assessed by comparison with physician manual contours using Dice similarity coefficients and Hausdorff distances. Eighty-three radiomics features were calculated for each delineated tumor contour. Informative features were identified based on their dynamic range and correlation to other features. Feature reliability was then evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Feature range was used to evaluate the uncertainty of the segmentation methods.
resultsFrom the initial set of 83 features, 40 radiomics features were found to be informative, and these 40 features were used in the subsequent analyses. For both intra-observer and inter-observer reliability, LSTK had higher reliability than GrowCut and the two manual segmentation tools. All observers achieved consistently high ICC values when using LSTK, but the ICC value varied greatly for each observer when using GrowCut and the manual segmentation tools. For inter-software reliability, features were not reproducible across the software tools for either manual or semi-automatic segmentation methods. Additionally, no feature category was found to be more reproducible than another feature category. Feature ranges of LSTK contours were smaller than those of manual contours for all features.
conclusionRadiomics features extracted from LSTK contours were highly reliable across and among observers. With semi-automatic segmentation tools, observers without formal clinical training were comparable to physicians in evaluating tumor segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.