Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30286144›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Non-pharmacological interventions for the improvement of post-stroke activities of daily living and disability amongst older stroke survivors: A systematic review.

Carrie Stewart, Selvarani Subbarayan, Pamela Paton, Elliot Gemmell, Iosief Abraha, Phyo Kyaw Myint, Denis O'Mahony, Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft, Antonio Cherubini, Roy L Soiza

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Carrie StewartDepartment of Old Age Medicine, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2325-3380
Selvarani SubbarayanDepartment of Old Age Medicine, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Pamela PatonDepartment of Old Age Medicine, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Elliot GemmellDepartment of Old Age Medicine, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4749-6704
Iosief AbrahaGeriatria, Accettazione geriatrica e Centro di ricerca per l'invecchiamento, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5440-775X
Phyo Kyaw MyintDepartment of Old Age Medicine, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3852-6158
Denis O'MahonyDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2236-5222
Alfonso J Cruz-JentoftFundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio CherubiniGeriatria, Accettazione geriatrica e Centro di ricerca per l'invecchiamento, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Roy L SoizaDepartment of Old Age Medicine, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESUniversity College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, stroke remains a leading cause of death and disability, with older adults disproportionately affected. Numerous non-pharmacological stroke rehabilitation approaches are in use to address impairments, but their efficacy in older persons is largely unknown. This systematic review examined the evidence for such interventions as part of the Optimal Evidence-Based Non-Drug Therapies in Older Persons (ONTOP) project conducted under an European Union funded project called the Software Engine for the Assessment and Optimisation of Drug and Non-Drug Therapies in Older Persons (SENATOR) [http://www.senator-project.eu]. A Delphi panel of European geriatric experts agreed activities of daily living and disability to be of critical importance as stroke rehabilitation outcomes. A comprehensive search strategy was developed and five databases (Pubmed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) searched for eligible systematic reviews. Primary studies meeting our criteria (non-pharmacologic interventions, involving stroke survivors aged ≥65 years, assessing activities of daily living and/or disability as outcome) were then identified from these reviews. Eligible papers were double reviewed, and due to heterogeneity, narrative analysis performed. Cochrane risk of bias and GRADE assessment tools were used to assess bias and quality of evidence, allowing us to make recommendations regarding specific non-pharmacologic rehabilitation in older stroke survivors. In total, 72 primary articles were reviewed spanning 14 types of non-pharmacological intervention. Non-pharmacological interventions based on physiotherapy and occupational therapy techniques improved activities of daily living amongst older stroke survivors. However, no evidence was found to support use of any non-pharmacological approach to benefit older stroke survivors' disability. Evidence was limited by poor study quality and the small number of studies targeting older stroke survivors. We recommend future studies explore such interventions exclusively in older adult populations and improve methodological and outcome reporting.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesStrokeStroke RehabilitationSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID30286144
PMCPMC6171865
OpenAlexW2895607998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.