Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30286129›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Retention of knowledge and skills after Emergency Obstetric Care training: A multi-country longitudinal study.

Charles A Ameh, Sarah White, Fiona Dickinson, Mselenge Mdegela, Barbara Madaj, Nynke van den Broek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Experiences of primary health care practitioners dealing with emergencies - 'We are on our own'.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charles A AmehCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2341-7605
Sarah WhiteCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Fiona DickinsonCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Mselenge MdegelaCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Barbara MadajCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Nynke van den BroekCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine retention of knowledge and skills after standardised "skills and drills" training in Emergency Obstetric Care.

designLongitudinal cohort study.

settingGhana, Malawi, Nigeria, Kenya, Tanzania and Sierra Leone. POPULATION: 609 maternity care providers, of whom 455 were nurse/midwives (NMWs).

methodsKnowledge and skills assessed before and after training, and, at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Analysis of variance to explore differences in scores by country and level of healthcare facility for each cadre. Mixed effects regression analysis to account for potential explanatory factors including; facility type, years of experience providing maternity care, months since training and number of repeat assessments.

main outcome measuresChange in knowledge and skills.

resultsBefore training the overall mean (SD) score for skills was 48.8% (11.6%) and 65.6% (10.7%). for knowledge. After training the mean (95% CI) relative improvement in knowledge was 30.8% (29.1% - 32.6%) and 59.8% (58.6%- 60.9%) for skills. Mean scores for knowledge and skills at each subsequent assessment remained between those immediately post-training and those at 3 months. NMWs who attended all four assessments demonstrated statistically better retention of skills (14.9%, 95% CI 7.8%, 22.0% p<0.001) but not knowledge (8.6%, 95% CI -0.3%, 17.4%. p = 0.06) compared to those who attended one or two assessments only. Health care facility level or experience were not determinants of retention.

conclusionsAfter training, healthcare providers retain knowledge and skills for up to 12 months. This effect can likely be enhanced by short repeat skills-training sessions, or, 'fire drills'.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeClinical CompetenceDelivery of Health CareEducation, MedicalEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleGhanaHealth PersonnelHumansKenyaLongitudinal StudiesMalawiMaleNigeriaNurse MidwivesObstetrics

Identifiers

PMID30286129
PMCPMC6171823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.