Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30286105›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Assessment and agreement of the CT appearance pattern and its severity grading of radiation-induced lung injury after stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Takaya Yamamoto, Noriyuki Kadoya, Yohei Morishita, Yoshinao Sato, Haruo Matsushita, Rei Umezawa, Yojiro Ishikawa, Noriyoshi Takahashi, Yu Katagiri, Ken Takeda and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takaya YamamotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3562-1037
Noriyuki KadoyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yohei MorishitaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yoshinao SatoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Haruo MatsushitaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Rei UmezawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yojiro IshikawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Noriyoshi TakahashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yu KatagiriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Ken TakedaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Keiichi JinguDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Tohoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadiographic severity of radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) has not been well-studied. The goal of this study was to assess the CT appearance pattern and severity of RILI without consideration of the clinical presentation. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 49 patients, 41 with primary lung cancer and 8 with metastatic lung cancer, were treated by 4-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). RILI after SBRT was separately assessed by two observers. The early and late CT appearance patterns and CT-based severity grading were explored.

resultsThe median follow-up period was 39.0 months. In the early CT findings of observers 1 and 2, there was diffuse consolidation in 15 and 8, diffuse ground glass opacity (GGO) in 0 and 0, patchy consolidation and GGO in 17 and 20, patchy GGO in 3 and 3, and no changes in 10 and 14, respectively (kappa = 0.61). In late CT findings of observer 1 and 2, there were modified conventional pattern in 28 and 24, mass-like pattern in 8 and 11, scar-like pattern in 12 and 12, and no changes in 1 and 2, respectively (kappa = 0.63). In the results of the CT-based grading by observers 1 and 2, there were grade 0 in 1 and 2, grade 1 in 10 and 14, grade 2 in 31 and 29, grade 3 in 7 and 4, and none of grade 4 or more, respectively (kappa = 0.66). According to multivariate analyses (MVA), the significant predicting factors of grade 2 or more CT-based RILI were age (p = 0.01), oxygen dependence (p = 0.03) and interstitial shadow (p = 0.03).

conclusionsThe agreement of the CT appearance and CT-based grading between two observers was good. These indicators may be able to provide us with more objective information and a better understanding of RILI.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung InjuryLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapyTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID30286105
PMCPMC6171841
OpenAlexW2894938357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.