Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30286086›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Dengue illness index-A tool to characterize the subjective dengue illness experience.

Stephen J Thomas, Liane Agulto, Kim Hendrickx, Martin Erpicum, Kay M Tomashek, M Cristina Cassetti, Catherine Laughlin, Alexander Precioso, Alexander C Schmidt, Federico Narvaez and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Stephen J ThomasDivision of Infectious Diseases, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States of America.
Liane AgultoDivision of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States of America.
Kim HendrickxFWO Postdoctoral Fellow of the Life Sciences & Society Lab, Center for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Martin ErpicumSPIRAL Research Center, Département de Science Politique, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Kay M TomashekDivision of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States of America.
M Cristina CassettiDivision of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States of America.
Catherine LaughlinDivision of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States of America.
Alexander PreciosoDivision of Clinical Trials and Pharmacovigilance, Butantan Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8657-9292
Alexander C SchmidtGSK Vaccines, Rockville, MD, United States of America.
Federico NarvaezInfectious Diseases Unit, National Pediatric Reference Hospital, Hospital Infantil Manuel de Jesús Rivera, Managua, Nicaragua.
João Bosco SiqueiraFederal University of Goias, Brasilia, Brazil.
Hasitha TisseraNational Dengue Control Unit, Ministry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Robert EdelmanCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Liège · BEGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USHospital Infantil Manuel de Jesús Rivera · NISUNY Upstate Medical University · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue virus infections are a major cause of febrile illness that significantly affects individual and societal productivity and drives up health care costs principally in the developing world. Two dengue vaccine candidates are in advanced clinical efficacy trials in Latin America and Asia, and another has been licensed in more than fifteen countries but its uptake has been limited. Despite these advances, standardized metrics for comparability of protective efficacy between dengue vaccines remain poorly defined. The Dengue Illness Index (DII) is a tool that we developed thru refinement of previous similar iterations in an attempt to improve and standardize the measurement of vaccine and drug efficacy in reducing moderate dengue illness. The tool is designed to capture an individual's overall disease experience based on how the totality of their symptoms impacts their general wellness and daily functionality. We applied the DII to a diary card, the Dengue Illness Card (DIC), which was examined and further developed by a working group. The card was then refined with feedback garnered from a Delphi methodology-based query that addressed the adequacy and applicability of the tool in clinical dengue research. There was overall agreement that the tool would generate useful data and provide an alternative perspective to the assessment of drug or vaccine candidates, which in the case of vaccines, are assessed by their reduction in any virologically confirmed dengue of any severity with a focus on the more severe. The DIC needs to be evaluated in the field in the context of vaccine or drug trials, prospective cohort studies, or during experimental human infection studies. Here, we present the final DIC resulting from the Delphi process and offer its further development or use to the dengue research community.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexClinical Trials as TopicDengueDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30286086
PMCPMC6171819
OpenAlexW2894741155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.