ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018
Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05611710 (Anakinra for Dengue Patients With Hyperinflammation - a Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Anakinra for Dengue Patients With Hyperinflammation - a Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic mapping review of therapeutic clinical trials in dengue.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Plasma leakage in dengue: a systematic review of prospective observational studies.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Pooled it
- Improving early prediction for adverse dengue outcomes using data from the IDAMS prospective multicentre study.Nature communications · 2026Observational
- Assessing the burden of diabetes mellitus in dengue patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.New microbes and new infections · 2026Article
- Proteomic signals are not equal clinical phenotypes: redefining evidence standards in arbovirus-SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactivity.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Epidemiology and severity risk factors of dengue virus infection during the 2023-2024 outbreak in Colombia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Different Clinical Severity and Outcomes in a Cohort of Patients With Dengue With Warning Signs in an Endemic Latin American City.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- Dengue.Lancet (London, England) · 2024Review
- Global and cell type-specific immunological hallmarks of severe dengue progression identified via a systems immunology approach.Nature immunology · 2023Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Among Travelers With Severe Dengue : A GeoSentinel Analysis.Annals of internal medicine · 2023Article
- Is new dengue vaccine efficacy data a relief or cause for concern?NPJ vaccines · 2023Review
- A modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for dengue: development, evaluation and proposal for use in clinical trials.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Observational
- Expert perspectives on the introduction of Triple Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (TACTs) in Southeast Asia: a Delphi study.BMC public health · 2022Article
- An 8-gene machine learning model improves clinical prediction of severe dengue progression.Genome medicine · 2022Article
- Rotational thromboelastometry in critical phase of dengue infection: Association with bleeding.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Article
- Knowledge gaps in the epidemiology of severe dengue impede vaccine evaluation.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2022Review
- Article
- Higher Plasma Viremia in the Febrile Phase Is Associated With Adverse Dengue Outcomes Irrespective of Infecting Serotype or Host Immune Status: An Analysis of 5642 Vietnamese Cases.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021Article
- Development of a bedside score to predict dengue severity.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dengue is a major public health problem worldwide. Although several drug candidates have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials, none has been effective and at present, early recognition of severe dengue and timely supportive care are used to reduce mortality. While the first dengue vaccine was recently licensed, and several other candidates are in late stage clinical trials, future decisions regarding widespread deployment of vaccines and/or therapeutics will require evidence of product safety, efficacy and effectiveness. Standard, quantifiable clinical endpoints are needed to ensure reproducibility and comparability of research findings. To address this need, we established a working group of dengue researchers and public health specialists to develop standardized endpoints and work towards consensus opinion on those endpoints. After discussion at two working group meetings and presentations at international conferences, a Delphi methodology-based query was used to finalize and operationalize the clinical endpoints. Participants were asked to select the best endpoints from proposed definitions or offer revised/new definitions, and to indicate whether contributing items should be designated as optional or required. After the third round of inquiry, 70% or greater agreement was reached on moderate and severe plasma leakage, moderate and severe bleeding, acute hepatitis and acute liver failure, and moderate and severe neurologic disease. There was less agreement regarding moderate and severe thrombocytopenia and moderate and severe myocarditis. Notably, 68% of participants agreed that a 50,000 to 20,000 mm3 platelet range be used to define moderate thrombocytopenia; however, they remained divided on whether a rapid decreasing trend or one platelet count should be case defining. While at least 70% agreement was reached on most endpoints, the process identified areas for further evaluation and standardization within the context of ongoing clinical studies. These endpoints can be used to harmonize data collection and improve comparability between dengue clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.