Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30286085›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials.

Kay M Tomashek, Bridget Wills, Lucy Chai See Lum, Laurent Thomas, Anna Durbin, Yee-Sin Leo, Norma de Bosch, Elsa Rojas, Kim Hendrickx, Martin Erpicum and 15 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05611710 (Anakinra for Dengue Patients With Hyperinflammation - a Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05611710 phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Anakinra for Dengue Patients With Hyperinflammation - a Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOxford University Clinical Research Unit, VietnamRan2023 to 2027Enrolled160ConditionsDengue, Dengue With Warning Signs, Severe Dengue, AnakinraArmsPlacebo, Anakinra
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dengue.Lancet (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Kay M TomashekDivision of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America (USA).ORCID 0000-0001-7741-7072
Bridget WillsOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Lucy Chai See LumDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Laurent ThomasEmergency Department, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique.
Anna DurbinDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Yee-Sin LeoInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Norma de BoschUniversidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela.
Elsa RojasEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Kim HendrickxFWO Postdoctoral Fellow of the Life Sciences & Society Lab, Center for Sociological Research, KU Leuven and Research Associate of SPIRAL Research Center, University of Liège, Belgium.
Martin ErpicumSPIRAL Research Center, University of Liège, Belgium.
Liane AgultoDivision of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America (USA).
Thomas JaenischDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hasitha TisseraNational Dengue Control Unit, Ministry of Health, Elvitigala Mawatha, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Piyarat SuntarattiwongDepartment of Pediatrics, Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Beth Ann CollersMerck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, United States of America.
Derek WallaceTakeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Zurich, Switzerland.
Alexander C SchmidtGlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) Vaccines, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Alexander PreciosoDivision of Clinical Trials and Pharmacovigilance, Butantan Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
Federico NarvaezInfectious Diseases Unit, National Pediatric Reference Hospital, Hospital Infantil Manuel de Jesús Rivera, Managua, Nicaragua.
Stephen J ThomasDivision of Infectious Diseases, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
Robert EdelmanCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
João Bosco SiqueiraFederal University of Goias, Brasilia, Brazil.
M Cristina CassettiDivision of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America (USA).
Walla DempseyDivision of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America (USA).
Duane J GublerEmerging Infectious Diseases Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue is a major public health problem worldwide. Although several drug candidates have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials, none has been effective and at present, early recognition of severe dengue and timely supportive care are used to reduce mortality. While the first dengue vaccine was recently licensed, and several other candidates are in late stage clinical trials, future decisions regarding widespread deployment of vaccines and/or therapeutics will require evidence of product safety, efficacy and effectiveness. Standard, quantifiable clinical endpoints are needed to ensure reproducibility and comparability of research findings. To address this need, we established a working group of dengue researchers and public health specialists to develop standardized endpoints and work towards consensus opinion on those endpoints. After discussion at two working group meetings and presentations at international conferences, a Delphi methodology-based query was used to finalize and operationalize the clinical endpoints. Participants were asked to select the best endpoints from proposed definitions or offer revised/new definitions, and to indicate whether contributing items should be designated as optional or required. After the third round of inquiry, 70% or greater agreement was reached on moderate and severe plasma leakage, moderate and severe bleeding, acute hepatitis and acute liver failure, and moderate and severe neurologic disease. There was less agreement regarding moderate and severe thrombocytopenia and moderate and severe myocarditis. Notably, 68% of participants agreed that a 50,000 to 20,000 mm3 platelet range be used to define moderate thrombocytopenia; however, they remained divided on whether a rapid decreasing trend or one platelet count should be case defining. While at least 70% agreement was reached on most endpoints, the process identified areas for further evaluation and standardization within the context of ongoing clinical studies. These endpoints can be used to harmonize data collection and improve comparability between dengue clinical trials.

Indexed as

Endpoint DeterminationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntiviral AgentsChildChild, PreschoolClinical Trials as TopicDengueDengue VaccinesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleAntiviral AgentsDengue Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID30286085
PMCPMC6171842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.