ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
Ten simple rules for scientists: Improving your writing productivity.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ten simple rules for turning your qualifying exam into an NIH-style fellowship proposal: A guide for graduate students.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Ten simple rules for organising an effective student-led writing retreat.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- An exploratory mixed-methods sentiment analysis of a social-emotional learning (SEL)-informed grant writing workshop in the biosciences.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025Article
- Engaging social-emotional motivators to improve the grant writing experience: a workshop model for teaching scientific writing.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025Article
- Evolution of artificial intelligence writing tools in domain of scientific writing: A threat to human writing and its ethical considerations.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Practical Considerations for Researchers at Teaching-Focused Colleges.Behavior analysis in practice · 2022Review
- Essential Guide to Manuscript Writing for Academic Dummies: An Editor's Perspective.Biochemistry research international · 2022Review
- Ten simple rules for navigating the computational aspect of an interdisciplinary PhD.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.