Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30285914›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2018

Perceptions and Experience of Patients, Staff, and Clinicians with Social Needs Assessment.

Courtnee Hamity, Ana Jackson, Lunarosa Peralta, Jim Bellows

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review of Electronic Community Resource Referral Systems.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Safeguarding Social Determinants of Health Data at a Managed Health Plan.Advances in health information science and practice · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Physician explanation of Z-coded homelessness in medicaid claims.Health services & outcomes research methodology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Courtnee HamityEvaluation Principal Consultant for the Kaiser Permanente Care Management Institute Center for Evaluation and Analytics in Oakland, CA (courtnee.l.hamity@kp.org).
Ana JacksonDirector of Evaluation at the Kaiser Permanente Care Management Institute Center for Evaluation and Analytics in Oakland, CA (ana.h.jackson@kp.org).
Lunarosa PeraltaEvaluation Consultant in the Kaiser Permanente Care Management Institute Center for Evaluation and Analytics in Oakland, CA (lunarosa.peralta@kp.org).
Jim BellowsManaging Director of the Kaiser Permanente Care Management Institute Center for Evaluation and Analytics in Oakland, CA (jim.bellows@kp.org).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextAssessment of social needs is expanding at Kaiser Permanente (KP), but little is known about how members and clinicians experience the incorporation of social needs into health care.

objectiveTo assess how KP members and clinicians experience social needs assessments incorporated into care.

designQualitative and descriptive analysis of data from member and clinician focus groups, interviews, and surveys among 68 members and family caregivers who had participated in social needs assessment programs and 90 clinicians and staff in the KP Colorado, Georgia, Northern California, Northwest, and Southern California Regions.

main outcome measuresMembers' and clinicians' perceptions and experiences of social needs assessment.

resultsMembers and clinicians understood the impact of social needs on health and why a health care system representative would ask about food, housing, transportation, and other social needs. Members and clinicians supported social needs assessment at KP and agreed that KP should help address identified social needs. However, both groups emphasized the importance of assessments yielding actionable information. Members were also concerned about how the information would be used and by whom.

conclusionOur findings support the continuing assessment of social needs at KP and identify issues that require attention as it expands. Assessment should not outpace organizational capacity to connect members with resources. Careful attention to communications is required because members may be uncertain or concerned about the purpose of the assessment and the dissemination of sensitive information. Messaging should assure members about data use and dissemination and what they can expect after screening.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Maintenance OrganizationsSocial SupportFocus GroupsFood SupplyHealth Care SurveysHousingHumansInterviews as TopicNeeds AssessmentPatient SatisfactionTransportationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30285914
PMCPMC6172028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.