Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30285898›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Laboratory evaluation of the efficacy of lotilaner (Credelio™) against Amblyomma cajennense (sensu lato) infestations of dogs.

Pedro Veloso Facury Lasmar, Martin Murphy, Steve Nanchen, Jason Drake, Katherina Coumendouros, Debora Azevedo Borges, Priscila Cardim de Oliveira, Fábio Barbour Scott

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Efficacy of lotilaner (CredelioParasites & vectors · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of oral fluralaner (BravectoParasites & vectors · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pedro Veloso Facury LasmarElanco Animal Health, Av. Morumbi, 8264, São Paulo, SP, 04703-002, Brazil.
Martin MurphyElanco Animal Health, Mattenstrasse 24a, CH-4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Steve NanchenElanco Animal Health, Mattenstrasse 24a, CH-4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Jason DrakeElanco Animal Health, 2500 Innovation Way, Greenfield, IN, 46140, USA. drake_jon_j@elanco.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6203-0852
Katherina CoumendourosRural Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, BR 465 km 7 UFRRJ, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil.
Debora Azevedo BorgesRural Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, BR 465 km 7 UFRRJ, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil.
Priscila Cardim de OliveiraRural Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, BR 465 km 7 UFRRJ, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil.
Fábio Barbour ScottRural Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, BR 465 km 7 UFRRJ, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ixodid tick Amblyomma cajennense (sensu lato) complex, widespread throughout South and Central America, is also present in Mexico, Texas and Florida. As a vector of Rickettsia rickettsii, and potentially of other pathogens, infestations with A. cajennense present a substantial health risk to humans, dogs and other mammals. Oral administration of lotilaner flavored chewable tablets (Credelio

methodsTwenty purpose-bred Beagles (10 male and 10 female) were ranked by Day -5 burdens of nymphal A. cajennense (s.l.) and randomized to either treatment with lotilaner or to a sham-treated control group. On Day 0, dogs were fed within approximately 30 min prior to oral lotilaner administration at as close as possible to 20 mg/kg, the minimum dose rate. For efficacy assessments, tick counts were completed 48 h post-treatment or 48 h after experimental challenge infestations with 200 nymphal A. cajennense (s.l.) on Days -7, -2, 7, 14, 21 and 28.

resultsTick infestations in the control group dogs ranged from a low of 43 to 95, with the average infestation remaining above 25% at each assessment, thereby meeting the requirement for efficacy comparison with the treated group. Lotilaner efficacy was 100% within 48 h post-treatment, and at nine days post-treatment. Efficacy was greater than 99% at all subsequent assessments through Day 30. No treatment-related adverse events were observed.

conclusionThe results demonstrate that lotilaner, administered orally to dogs at a minimum dose of 20 mg/kg is well tolerated, provides rapid reduction of existing A. cajennense (s.l.) tick infestations, and provides sustained residual protection for at least 30 days against subsequent infestation by A. cajennense (s.l.).

Indexed as

AcaricidesAdministration, OralAnimalsDog DiseasesDogsFemaleIxodidaeMaleNymphTick ControlTick InfestationsTreatment OutcomeAcaricidesCanineCayenne tickEffectivenessIsoxazolineTicks

Identifiers

PMID30285898
PMCPMC6171179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.