Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30285883›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2018

Breast cancer survival predicted by TP53 mutation status differs markedly depending on treatment.

Nathan A Ungerleider, Sonia G Rao, Ashkan Shahbandi, Douglas Yee, Tianhua Niu, Wesley D Frey, James G Jackson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Clinical Relevance ofCancers · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan A UngerleiderDepartment of Pathology, Tulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Sonia G RaoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Avenue, mail code 8543, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Ashkan ShahbandiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Avenue, mail code 8543, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Douglas YeeDivision of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Tianhua NiuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Avenue, mail code 8543, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Wesley D FreyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Avenue, mail code 8543, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
James G JacksonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Avenue, mail code 8543, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. jjacks8@tulane.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2640-6442
Tulane University · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Translational Genomics CoreP30GM114732 · NIGMS · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI OCHOA, AUGUSTO C. · 2015 to 2019
$5.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1P30GM114732-01NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM114732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies on the role of TP53 mutation in breast cancer treatment response and survival are contradictory and inconclusive, limited by the use of different endpoints to determine clinical significance and by small sample sizes that prohibit stratification by treatment.

methodsWe utilized large datasets to examine overall survival according to TP53 mutation status in patients across multiple clinical features and treatments.

resultsConfirming other studies, we found that in all patients and in hormone therapy-treated patients, TP53 wild-type status conferred superior 5-year overall survival, but survival curves crossed at 10 or more years. In contrast, further stratification within the large dataset revealed that in patients receiving chemotherapy and no hormone therapy, wild-type TP53 status conferred remarkably poor overall survival. This previously unrecognized inferior survival is consistent with p53 inducing arrest/senescence instead of apoptosis. Addition of hormone therapy to chemotherapy improved survival notably in patients with TP53 wild-type tumors, but not mutant, suggesting hormone therapy could eradicate arrested/senescent cells. Testing this, we found that estrogen receptor-positive, TP53 wild-type breast cancer cells that were made senescent by doxorubicin treatment were sensitive to tamoxifen.

conclusionsThe poor survival of chemotherapy-treated patients with TP53 wild-type tumors may be improved by strategies to eliminate senescent cells, including the addition of hormone therapy when appropriate.

Indexed as

MutationAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsDoxorubicinErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMCF-7 CellsPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTamoxifenTumor Suppressor Protein p53DoxorubicinErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTamoxifenTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Breast cancerChemotherapyHormone therapySenescenceSurvivalTP53

Identifiers

PMID30285883
PMCPMC6167800
OpenAlexW2894491737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.