Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30285848›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2018

Factor analysis of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measures (CORE-OM) in a Kenyan sample.

Fredrik Falkenström, Manasi Kumar, Aiysha Zahid, Mary Kuria, Caleb Othieno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Fredrik FalkenströmDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, SE-581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
Manasi KumarDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 19676, Nairobi, 00202, Kenya. m.kumar@ucl.ac.uk.
Aiysha ZahidQueen Mary's College, Miles End, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Mary KuriaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 19676, Nairobi, 00202, Kenya.
Caleb OthienoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 19676, Nairobi, 00202, Kenya.
University of Nairobi · KELinköping University · SEQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Programatic-Strengthening Medical Education for Improved Health Outcomes in KenyaR24TW008889 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI · PI KIBWAGE, ISAAC ONGUBO · 2010 to 2014
$10.4M
FIC NIH HHS R24 TW008889National Institute of Mental Health 1R24TW008889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no generic psychotherapy outcome measure validated for Kenyan populations. The objective of this study was to test the acceptability and factor structure of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure in patients attending psychiatric clinics at two state-owned hospitals in Nairobi.

methodsThree hundred and forty-five patients filled out the CORE-OM after their initial therapy session. Confirmatory and Exploratory Factor Analysis (CFA/EFA) were used to study the factor structure of the CORE-OM.

resultsThe English version of the CORE-OM seemed acceptable and understandable to psychiatric patients seeking treatment at the state-owned hospitals in Nairobi. Factor analyses showed that a model with a general distress factor, a risk factor, and a method factor for positively framed items fit the data best according to both CFA and EFA analysis. Coefficient Omega Hierarchical showed that the general distress factor was reliably measured even if differential responding to positively framed items was regarded as error variance.

conclusionsThe English language version of the CORE-OM can be used with psychiatric patients attending psychiatric treatment in Nairobi. The factor structure was more or less the same as has been shown in previous studies. The most important limitation is the relatively small sample size.

Indexed as

Stress, PsychologicalAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansKenyaMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychological TechniquesPsychometricsPsychotherapyReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslatingFactor analysisOutcome measurementPsychological assessmentPsychological distressPsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID30285848
PMCPMC6167850
OpenAlexW2894778147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.