Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30285820›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2018

Factors associated with high-risk human papillomavirus test utilization and infection: a population-based study of uninsured and underinsured women.

Adana A M Llanos, Jennifer Tsui, David Rotter, Lindsey Toler, Antoinette M Stroup

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adana A M LlanosDepartment of Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Lane West, Room 211, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA. Adana.Llanos@rutgers.edu.
Jennifer TsuiDivision of Population Science, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
David RotterDivision of Population Science, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Lindsey TolerDepartment of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Antoinette M StroupDepartment of Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Lane West, Room 211, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILINGP30CA072720 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Tracie Saunders · 1997 to 2026
$94.5M
NEW JERSEY CANCER PREVENTION & CONTROL PROGRAMU58DP003931 · DP · NEW JERSEY STATE DEPT/HEALTH/SENIOR SRVS · PI RODRIQUEZ, GLORIA · 2012 to 2014
$11.9M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP003931NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201300021CNCI NIH HHS P30 CA072720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent cervical cancer screening guidelines recommend a Pap test every 3 years for women age 21-65 years, or for women 30-65 years who want to lengthen the screening interval, a combination of Pap test and high-risk human papilloma virus testing (co-testing) every 5 years. Little population-based data are available on human papilloma virus test utilization and human papilloma virus infection rates. The objective of this study was to examine the patient-level, cervical cancer screening, and area-level factors associated with human papilloma virus testing and infection among a diverse sample of uninsured and underinsured women enrolled in the New Jersey Cancer Early Education and Detection (NJCEED) Program.

methodsWe used data for a sample of 50,510 uninsured/underinsured women, age ≥ 29 years, who screened for cervical cancer through NJCEED between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2015. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between ever having a human papilloma virus test or a positive test result, and individual- (age, race/ethnicity, birthplace) and area-level covariates (% below federal poverty level, % minority, % uninsured), and number of screening visits.

resultsOnly 26.6% (13,440) of the sample had at least one human papilloma virus test. Among women who underwent testing, 13.3% (1792) tested positive for human papilloma virus. Most women who were positive for human papilloma virus (99.4%) had their first test as a co-test. Human papilloma virus test utilization and infection were significantly associated with age, race/ethnicity, birthplace (country), and residential area-level poverty. Rates of human papilloma virus testing and infection also differed significantly across counties in the state of New Jersey.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that despite access to no-cost cervical cancer screening for eligible women, human papilloma virus test utilization was relatively low among diverse, uninsured and underinsured women in New Jersey, and test utilization and infection were associated with individual-level and area-level factors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestPapillomavirus InfectionsPovertyResearch DesignUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal SmearsYoung AdultCervical cancer screeningCo-testingDisparitiesHPVMedically underservedMinority populationsUninsured

Identifiers

PMID30285820
PMCPMC6171187
OpenAlexW2895149840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.