Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30285812›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2018

A novel model to correlate hydrogel spacer placement, perirectal space creation, and rectum dosimetry in prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Mark E Hwang, Paul J Black, Carl D Elliston, Brian A Wolthuis, Deborah R Smith, Cheng-Chia Wu, Sven Wenske, Israel Deutsch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark E HwangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, 10032, USA.
Paul J BlackDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, 10032, USA.
Carl D EllistonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, 10032, USA.
Brian A WolthuisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, 10032, USA.
Deborah R SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, 10032, USA.
Cheng-Chia WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, 10032, USA.
Sven WenskeDepartment of Urology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, 10032, New York, USA.
Israel DeutschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, 10032, USA. id2182@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe SpaceOAR hydrogel is employed to limit rectal radiation dose during prostate radiotherapy. We identified a novel parameter - the product of angle θ and hydrogel volume - to quantify hydrogel placement. This parameter predicted rectum dosimetry and acute rectal toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions.

methodsTwenty men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer underwent hydrogel placement from 2015 to 2017. Hydrogel symmetry was assessed on the CT simulation scan in 3 axial slices (midgland, 1 cm above midgland, 1 cm below midgland). Two novel parameters quantifying hydrogel placement - hydrogel volume and angle θ formed by the prostate, hydrogel, and rectum - were measured, and the normalized product of θ and hydrogel volume calculated. These were then correlated with perirectal distance, rectum maximum 1-3 cc point doses (rD

resultsIn 50% of patients, hydrogel placement was symmetric bilaterally to within 1 cm of midline in all three CT simulation scan axial slices. Lateral hydrogel asymmetry < 2 cm in any one axial slice did not affect rectum dosimetry, but absence of hydrogel in the inferior axial slice resulted in a mean increase of 171 cGy in the rD

conclusionsOptimal hydrogel placement occurs at prostate midgland, midline. The novel parameter θ*hydrogel volume describes a large proportion of rectum dosimetric benefit derived from hydrogel placement, and can be used to assess the learning curve phenomenon for hydrogel placement.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalRadiosurgeryAgedAged, 80 and overFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydrogelsMaleMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRectumHydrogelsDosimetryProstate cancerRectal toxicitySpaceOAR hydrogelStereotactic body radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID30285812
PMCPMC6167802
OpenAlexW2893310358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.