Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30285746›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2018

Patient capacity for self-care in the medical record of patients with chronic conditions: a mixed-methods retrospective study.

Kasey R Boehmer, Maria Kyriacou, Emma Behnken, Megan Branda, Victor M Montori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Predictors of Older Adult Adherence With Emergency Department Discharge Instructions.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Instruments Measuring Self-Care and Self-Management of Chronic Conditions by Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Scoping Review.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Treatment burden for patients with multimorbidity: cross-sectional study with exploration of a single-item measure.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kasey R BoehmerKnowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA. Boehmer.Kasey@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5637-6803
Maria KyriacouPhoebe Family Medicine Residency, Albany, GA, USA.
Emma BehnkenKnowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Megan BrandaKnowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Victor M MontoriKnowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with chronic conditions must mobilize capacity to access and use healthcare and enact self-care. In order for clinicians to create feasible treatment plans with patients, they must appreciate the limits and possibilities of patient capacity. This study seeks to characterize the amount, nature, and comprehensiveness of the information about patient capacity documented in the medical record.

methodsIn this mixed-methods study, we extracted notes about 6 capacity domains from the medical records of 100 patients receiving care from 15 primary care clinicians at a single practice. Using a generalized linear model to account for repeated measures across multiple encounters, we calculated the rate of documented domains per encounter per patient adjusted for appointment type and number. Following quantitative analyses, we purposefully selected records to conduct inductive content analysis.

resultsAfter adjusting for number of appointments and appointment type, primary care notes contained the most mentions of capacity. Physical capacity was most noted, followed by personal, emotional, social, financial, and environmental. Qualitatively, we found three documentation patterns: patients with broad capacity notes, patients with predominantly physical domain capacity notes, and patients with capacity notes mostly in domains other than physical. Records contained almost no mention of patients' environmental or financial capacity, or of how they coped with capacity limitations. Rarely, did notes ever mention how well patients interacted with their social network or what support they provided to the patient in managing their health.

conclusionMedical records scarcely document patient capacity. This may impair the ability of clinicians to determine how patients can handle patient work, at what point patient capacity might become overwhelmed leading to poor adherence and health outcomes, and how best to craft feasible treatment programs that patients can implement with high fidelity.

Indexed as

DocumentationSelf CareSelf-ManagementSocial NetworkingAdultAgedChronic DiseaseEconomic StatusEnvironmentFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLinear ModelsMaleMedical RecordsMiddle AgedChronic conditionsChronic illnessElectronic health recordElectronic medical recordMinimally disruptive medicineMultimorbidityPatient capacityTreatment burdenTreatment planning

Identifiers

PMID30285746
PMCPMC6169082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.