Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30285712›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2018

Listen to the outpatient: qualitative explanatory study on medical students' recognition of outpatients' narratives in combined ambulatory clerkship and peer role-play.

Noriyuki Takahashi, Muneyoshi Aomatsu, Takuya Saiki, Takashi Otani, Nobutaro Ban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Role-play of real patients improves the clinical performance of medical students.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noriyuki TakahashiDepartment of General Medicine / Family and Community Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan. nori1007@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1982-7019
Muneyoshi AomatsuDepartment of General Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8560, Japan.
Takuya SaikiMedical Education Development Center, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1193, Japan.
Takashi OtaniDepartment of Educational Sciences, Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Nagoya University, Furo-cho Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan.
Nobutaro BanDepartment of General Medicine / Family and Community Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24659239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding patients' narratives has been associated with methods of improving care that go beyond what may be regarded as a "narrow" view of scientific medicine. Medical interview training in which medical students develop understanding of the importance of patients' narratives is receiving increased attention. However, students generally receive education on patients' narratives that does not distinguish inpatients and outpatients. No studies exploring the characteristics of outpatients' narratives have been reported. We developed an educational program combining ambulatory clerkship and peer role-play using actual narratives from outpatients that students had encountered during their clerkship. These narratives were used as peer role-play scenarios in which the students acted as outpatients. This study explored what and how medical students learned about the characteristics of outpatients' narratives through this original educational program.

methodsParticipants were 70 fifth-year medical students from Nagoya University, Japan. We conducted 13 focus groups, based on a convenience sample of 11 groups in 2012, one group in 2013, and one group in 2017 (from 17 clinical groups in each year). Focus group transcripts were analyzed using the "Steps for Coding and Theorization" qualitative data analysis method. We assessed medical anthropological findings regarding narratives in a conceptual framework.

resultsPatients' narratives as perceived by medical students were divided into four quadrants by two axes: medical versus lived content, and objective versus subjective structure. Students recognized that outpatients' narratives mainly used a subjective structure, but were mixed and crossed each quadrant. This was described as "irreproducibility." Students also recognized that narratives of simulated patients and inpatients were mainly limited to a medical-lived content with an objective structure. These differences in narrative characteristics were recognized through students' previous interactions with simulated patients and inpatients.

conclusionsDespite some limitations, medical students learn about patients' narratives in our original educational program in a way that would be difficult to achieve through training using simulated patients or inpatients.

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsClinical ClerkshipClinical CompetenceCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFamily PracticeFemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsJapanMaleQualitative ResearchStudents, MedicalAmbulatory clerkshipMedical interviewOutpatientPatients’ narrativesPeer role-playUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID30285712
PMCPMC6171171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.