Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30285669›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Cost analysis of implementing mHealth intervention for maternal, newborn & child health care through community health workers: assessment of ReMIND program in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Shankar Prinja, Aditi Gupta, Pankaj Bahuguna, Ruby Nimesh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cost-Effectiveness of mHealth Intervention (TeCHO+) for Improving Maternal and Child Health Indicators in Gujarat, India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shankar PrinjaSchool of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector-12, Chandigarh, 160012, India. shankarprinja@gmail.com.
Aditi GuptaSchool of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector-12, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Pankaj BahugunaSchool of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector-12, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Ruby NimeshSchool of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector-12, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

United States Agency for International Development AID-386-O-14-00040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main intervention under ReMiND program consisted of a mobile health application which was used by community health volunteers, called ASHAs, for counselling pregnant women and nursing mothers. This program was implemented in two rural blocks in Uttar Pradesh state of India with an overall aim to increase quality of health care, thereby increasing utilization of maternal & child health services. The aim of the study was to assess annual & unit cost of ReMiND program and its scale up in UP state. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Economic costing was done from the health system and patient's perspectives. All resources used during designing & planning phase i.e., development of application; and implementation of the intervention, were quantified and valued. Capital costs were annualised, after assessing their average number of years for which a product could be used and accounting for its depreciation. Shared or joint costs were apportioned for the time value a resource was utilized under intervention. Annual cost of implementing ReMiND in two blocks of UP along and unit cost per pregnant woman were estimated. Scale-up cost for implementing the intervention in entire state was calculated under two scenarios - first, if no extra human resource were employed; and second, if the state government adopted the same pattern of human resource as employed under this program.

resultsThe annual cost for rolling out ReMiND in two blocks of district Kaushambi was INR 12.1 million (US $ 191,894). The annualised start-up cost constituted 9% of overall cost while rest of cost was attributed to implementation of the intervention. The health system program costs in ReMiND were estimated to be INR 31.4 (US $ 0.49) per capita per year and INR 1294 (US $ 20.5) per registered women. The per capita incremental cost of scale up of intervention in UP state was estimated to be INR 4.39 (US $ 0.07) when no additional supervisory staffs were added.

conclusionThe cost of scale up of ReMiND in Uttar Pradesh is 6% of annual budget for 'reproductive and child health' line item under state budget, and hence appears to be financially sustainable.

Indexed as

AdultCommunity Health WorkersCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansIndiaMaternal-Child Health ServicesMaternal Health ServicesPrenatal CareTelemedicineYoung AdultCommunity health volunteersCosting analysisHealth system costMaternal and child healthmHealth

Identifiers

PMID30285669
PMCPMC6171293
OpenAlexW2895219557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.