Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30285624›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2018

Efficient generation of stable, heritable gene edits in wheat using CRISPR/Cas9.

Rhian M Howells, Melanie Craze, Sarah Bowden, Emma J Wallington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Wheat's Up with CRISPR-Cas-Current Advances, Obstacles and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Transgenerational Paternal Inheritance ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rhian M HowellsThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, UK.
Melanie CrazeThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, UK.
Sarah BowdenThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, UK.
Emma J WallingtonThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, UK. emma.wallington@niab.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3715-7901

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J019356/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of CRISPR/Cas9 systems could prove to be a valuable tool in crop research, providing the ability to fully knockout gene function in complex genomes or to precisely adjust gene function by knockout of individual alleles.

resultsWe compare gene editing in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) with diploid barley (Hordeum vulgare), using a combination of single genome and tri-genome targeting. High efficiency gene editing, 11-17% for single genome targeted guides and 5% for tri-genome targeted guides, was achieved in wheat using stable Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Gene editing in wheat was shown to be predominantly heterozygous, edits were inherited in a Mendelian fashion over multiple generations and no off-target effects were observed. Comparison of editing between the two species demonstrated that more stable, heritable edits were produced in wheat, whilst barley exhibited continued and somatic editing.

conclusionOur work shows the potential to obtain stable edited transgene-free wheat lines in 36 weeks through only two generations and that targeted mutagenesis of individual homeologues within the wheat genome is achievable with a modest amount of effort, and without off-target mutations or the need for lengthy crossing strategies.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsAgrobacteriumDNA, BacterialGene EditingGenome, PlantHordeumPlant BreedingPlants, Genetically ModifiedTransformation, GeneticTriticumDNA, BacterialT-DNACRISPR\Cas9Genome editingHeritabilityHordeum vulgareKnockoutTriticum aestivum

Identifiers

PMID30285624
PMCPMC6171145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.