Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30285469›Full record

SynthesisDento maxillo facial radiology2019

Diagnostic ultrasound assessment of temporomandibular joints: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fabiana Tolentino Almeida, Camila Pacheco-Pereira, Carlos Flores-Mir, Lawrence H Le, Jacob L Jaremko, Paul W Major

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Academic-Year Differences in Dental Students' Knowledge of Non-Ionising Imaging: MRI-Related Dental Material Safety and Ultrasonography.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabiana Tolentino Almeida1 School of Dentistry, University of Alberta , Edmonton, AB , Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-4224
Camila Pacheco-Pereira1 School of Dentistry, University of Alberta , Edmonton, AB , Canada.
Carlos Flores-Mir1 School of Dentistry, University of Alberta , Edmonton, AB , Canada.
Lawrence H Le2 Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta , Edmonton, AB , Canada.
Jacob L Jaremko2 Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta , Edmonton, AB , Canada.
Paul W Major1 School of Dentistry, University of Alberta , Edmonton, AB , Canada.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the diagnostic capability of ultrasound to assess TMJ alterations as disc displacement (DD), joint effusion (JE) and condylar changes (CC) using 3D imaging modalities as reference standard.

methods: Studies were gathered by searching several electronic databases and partial grey literature up to January eighth, 2018 without restrictions of language and time. The risk of bias was evaluated using the second version of Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic of Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADEpro system) instrument was applied to assess the level of evidence across the studies.

results: After applying the eligibility criteria, 28 studies were identified and synthesized. All studies were methodologically acceptable presenting low applicability concerns, although none of them fulfilled all QUADAS-2 criteria. The quantitative analysis included 22 studies, 2829 joints in total. The quality of the evidence evaluated by GRADE system suggested moderate confidence in estimating the outcomes.

conclusion: This systematic review demonstrated the ultrasound has acceptable capability to screen for DD and JE in TMD patients. For screening of condylar changes, ultrasound needs further studies using CT or CBCT as reference standard to support its use. More advanced imaging such as MRI can thereafter be used to confirm the diagnosis if deemed necessary.

Indexed as

Temporomandibular JointTemporomandibular Joint DisordersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonographysystematic reviewtemporomandibular jointtemporomandibular joint disorderultrasound

Identifiers

PMID30285469
PMCPMC6476374
OpenAlexW2895056760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.