ArticleSouthern medical journal2018
Effects of Religious Involvement on HIV Management Outcomes Among HIV-Positive Adults in Central North Carolina.
Article in Southern medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Religious social capital and minority health: A concept analysis.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.) · 2022Article
- Moderation effect of community health on the relationship between racial/ethnic residential segregation and HIV viral suppression in South Carolina: A county-level longitudinal study from 2013 to 2018.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe goals of this pilot cross-sectional study were to determine the feasibility of and begin measuring the effect of religious institution affiliation on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinical outcomes in the southern United States, a region marked by later initiation of antiretroviral therapy, higher HIV-related morbidity, and higher mortality rates than people living with HIV (PLWH) elsewhere in the country. It also is a region with a high density of religious institutions, which may facilitate improved health outcomes through leveraged social capital. Because spirituality is a personal construct and PLWH constitute a vulnerable population, we wanted to determine whether it would be feasible to survey patients about the topic. We hypothesized that PLWH would be willing to participate and that PLWH who report involvement in religious institutions would be more likely to have suppressed HIV viral loads (VLs) and better engagement in care than PLWH not involved in a religious institution.
methodsEligible participants were enrolled from the Wake Forest Infectious Diseases Specialty Clinic to complete structured interviews using validated measures of religious institution affiliation, spiritual well-being, social support, and HIV-related stigma. HIV VL and engagement in care (clinic no-show rate) data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Descriptive statistics calculated the prevalence of religious institution involvement, outcomes of interest, and potential confounders.
resultsFifty participants completed the study (55% participation rate); 72% identified as male and 28% identified as female. A total of 48% of participants identified as black/African American and 44% identified as white. Participants who identified as men who have sex with men made up 34%. More black/African American participants than white participants reported religious institution affiliation (23%;
conclusionPLWH in a southern US clinic were willing to answer questions about their spirituality. Religious institution affiliation was not significantly related to virologic suppression or CD4 in this sample. Higher levels of self-reported social support (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.