Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30285189›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2019

Opioid, antipsychotic and hypnotic use in end of life in long-term care facilities in six European countries: results of PACE.

Marc Tanghe, Nele Van Den Noortgate, Lara Pivodic, Luc Deliens, Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Katarzyna Szczerbinska, Harriet Finne-Soveri, Danni Collingridge-Moore, Giovanni Gambassi, Lieve Van den Block and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marc TangheEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Nele Van Den NoortgateDepartment of Geriatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Lara PivodicEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Luc DeliensEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Bregje Onwuteaka-PhilipsenMedisch Centrum, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Katarzyna SzczerbinskaJagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Harriet Finne-SoveriNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Danni Collingridge-MooreLancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Giovanni GambassiFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Lieve Van den BlockEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Ruth PiersDepartment of Geriatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
PACE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Opioids, antipsychotics and hypnotics are recommended for comfort care in dying. We studied their prescription during the last 3 days in residents deceased in the long-term care facility (LTCF). Methods: In a retrospective, cross-sectional survey in Belgium, England, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland, LTCFs, selected by proportional stratified random sampling, reported all deaths over the previous 3 months. The nurse most involved in the residents' care reviewed the chart for opioid, antipsychotic and hypnotic prescription, cause of death and comorbidities. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for resident characteristics. Results: Response rate was 81.6%. We included 1079 deceased residents in 322 LCTFs. Opioid prescription ranged from 18.5% (95% CI: 13.0-25.8) of residents in Poland to 77.9% (95% CI: 69.5-84.5) in the Netherlands, antipsychotic prescription from 4.8% (95% CI: 2.4-9.1) in Finland to 22.4% (95% CI: 14.7-32.4) in Italy, hypnotic prescription from 7.8% (95% CI: 4.6-12.8) in Finland to 47.9% (95% CI: 38.5-57.3) in the Netherlands. Differences in opioid, antipsychotic and hypnotic prescription between countries remained significant (P < 0.001) when controlling for age, gender, length of stay, cognitive status, cause of death in multilevel, multivariable analyses. Dying from cancer showed higher odds for receiving opioids (OR 3.51; P < 0.001) and hypnotics (OR 2.10; P = 0.010). Conclusions: Opioid, antipsychotic and hypnotic prescription in the dying phase differed significantly between six European countries. Further research should determine the appropriateness of their prescription and refine guidelines especially for LTCF residents dying of non-cancer diseases.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidAntipsychotic AgentsBelgiumCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleFinlandHumansHypnotics and SedativesItalyLong-Term CareMaleNetherlandsPalliative CareAnalgesics, OpioidAntipsychotic AgentsHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID30285189
PMCPMC6345144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.