Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30285154›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2018

Why are Hoogsteen base pairs energetically disfavored in A-RNA compared to B-DNA?

Atul Rangadurai, Huiqing Zhou, Dawn K Merriman, Nathalie Meiser, Bei Liu, Honglue Shi, Eric S Szymanski, Hashim M Al-Hashimi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Nucleobases in Meteorites to Nucleobases in RNA and DNA?Journal of molecular evolution · 2022
    Article
  10. Probing Watson-Crick and Hoogsteen base pairing in duplex DNA using dynamic nuclear polarization solid-state NMR spectroscopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A quantitative model predicts how mNature communications · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Atul RangaduraiDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Huiqing ZhouDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Dawn K MerrimanDepartment of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Nathalie MeiserGoethe University, Institute for Organic Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Bei LiuDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Honglue ShiDepartment of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Eric S SzymanskiDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Hashim M Al-HashimiDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · USGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

Role of DNA structural dynamics in mutagenesis and oncogenesisR01GM089846 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Hashim M Al-Hashimi · 2010 to 2026
$5.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A(syn)-U/T and G(syn)-C+ Hoogsteen (HG) base pairs (bps) are energetically more disfavored relative to Watson-Crick (WC) bps in A-RNA as compared to B-DNA by >1 kcal/mol for reasons that are not fully understood. Here, we used NMR spectroscopy, optical melting experiments, molecular dynamics simulations and modified nucleotides to identify factors that contribute to this destabilization of HG bps in A-RNA. Removing the 2'-hydroxyl at single purine nucleotides in A-RNA duplexes did not stabilize HG bps relative to WC. In contrast, loosening the A-form geometry using a bulge in A-RNA reduced the energy cost of forming HG bps at the flanking sites to B-DNA levels. A structural and thermodynamic analysis of purine-purine HG mismatches reveals that compared to B-DNA, the A-form geometry disfavors syn purines by 1.5-4 kcal/mol due to sugar-backbone rearrangements needed to sterically accommodate the syn base. Based on MD simulations, an additional penalty of 3-4 kcal/mol applies for purine-pyrimidine HG bps due to the higher energetic cost associated with moving the bases to form hydrogen bonds in A-RNA versus B-DNA. These results provide insights into a fundamental difference between A-RNA and B-DNA duplexes with important implications for how they respond to damage and post-transcriptional modifications.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationBase PairingDNADNA, B-FormEnergy MetabolismHydrogen BondingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularPurinesPyrimidinesRNAThermodynamicsDNADNA, B-FormpurinePurinespyrimidinePyrimidinesRNA

Identifiers

PMID30285154
PMCPMC6237737
OpenAlexW2895771703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.