Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30285150›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heredity2018

Effect of Hidden Relatedness on Single-Step Genetic Evaluation in an Advanced Open-Pollinated Breeding Program.

Jaroslav Klápšte, Mari Suontama, Heidi S Dungey, Emily J Telfer, Natalie J Graham, Charlie B Low, Grahame T Stovold

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heredity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jaroslav KlápšteScion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd.), Whakarewarewa, Rotorua, New Zealand. Mari Suontama is now at Skogforsk, Umeå, Sävar SE, Sweden.
Mari SuontamaScion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd.), Whakarewarewa, Rotorua, New Zealand. Mari Suontama is now at Skogforsk, Umeå, Sävar SE, Sweden.
Heidi S DungeyScion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd.), Whakarewarewa, Rotorua, New Zealand. Mari Suontama is now at Skogforsk, Umeå, Sävar SE, Sweden.
Emily J TelferScion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd.), Whakarewarewa, Rotorua, New Zealand. Mari Suontama is now at Skogforsk, Umeå, Sävar SE, Sweden.
Natalie J GrahamScion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd.), Whakarewarewa, Rotorua, New Zealand. Mari Suontama is now at Skogforsk, Umeå, Sävar SE, Sweden.
Charlie B LowScion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd.), Whakarewarewa, Rotorua, New Zealand. Mari Suontama is now at Skogforsk, Umeå, Sävar SE, Sweden.
Grahame T StovoldScion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd.), Whakarewarewa, Rotorua, New Zealand. Mari Suontama is now at Skogforsk, Umeå, Sävar SE, Sweden.
Scion · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open-pollinated (OP) mating is frequently used in forest tree breeding due to the relative temporal and financial efficiency of the approach. The trade-off is the lower precision of the estimated genetic parameters. Pedigree/sib-ship reconstruction has been proven as a tool to correct and complete pedigree information and to improve the precision of genetic parameter estimates. Our study analyzed an advanced generation Eucalyptus population from an OP breeding program using single-step genetic evaluation. The relationship matrix inferred from sib-ship reconstruction was used to rescale the marker-based relationship matrix (G matrix). This was compared with a second scenario that used rescaling based on the documented pedigree. The proposed single-step model performed better with respect to both model fit and the theoretical accuracy of breeding values. We found that the prediction accuracy was superior when using the pedigree information only when compared with using a combination of the pedigree and genomic information. This pattern appeared to be mainly a result of accumulated unrecognized relatedness over several breeding cycles, resulting in breeding values being shrunk toward the population mean. Using biased, pedigree-based breeding values as the base with which to correlate predicted GEBVs, resulted in the underestimation of prediction accuracies. Using breeding values estimated on the basis of sib-ship reconstruction resulted in increased prediction accuracies of the genotyped individuals. Therefore, selection of the correct base for estimation of prediction accuracy is critical. The beneficial impact of sib-ship reconstruction using G matrix rescaling was profound, especially in traits with inbreeding depression, such as stem diameter.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantPollinationBreedingEucalyptusGenetic MarkersGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID30285150
PMCPMC6208454
OpenAlexW2895672224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.