ArticleThe Journal of heredity2018
Effect of Hidden Relatedness on Single-Step Genetic Evaluation in an Advanced Open-Pollinated Breeding Program.
Article in The Journal of heredity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heritability of early seedling growth in Taxus baccata, a declining conifer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Accelerating eucalypt clone selection pipeline via cloned progeny trials and molecular data.Plant methods · 2025Article
- Genomic evaluation for breeding and genetic management in Cordia africana, a multipurpose tropical tree species.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Realized genomic selection across generations in a reciprocal recurrent selection breeding program ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Article
- Accounting for population structure in genomic predictions of Eucalyptus globulus.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Improving lodgepole pine genomic evaluation using spatial correlation structure and SNP selection with single-step GBLUP.Heredity · 2022Article
- Achievements and Challenges of Genomics-Assisted Breeding in Forest Trees: From Marker-Assisted Selection to Genome Editing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Single-step genomic BLUP enables joint analysis of disconnected breeding programs: an example with Eucalyptus globulus Labill.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Single-step genomic prediction of Eucalyptus dunnii using different identity-by-descent and identity-by-state relationship matrices.Heredity · 2021Article
- Genomic Breeding for Diameter Growth and Tolerance toFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the efficiency of genomic versus pedigree predictions for growth and wood quality traits in Scots pine.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Genomic Studies Reveal Substantial Dominant Effects and Improved Genomic Predictions in an Open-Pollinated Breeding Population ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Effect of trait's expression level on single-step genomic evaluation of resistance to Dothistroma needle blight.BMC plant biology · 2020Article
- A high-density exome capture genotype-by-sequencing panel for forestry breeding in Pinus radiata.PloS one · 2019Article
- Single-step genomic prediction of fruit-quality traits using phenotypic records of non-genotyped relatives in citrus.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Open-pollinated (OP) mating is frequently used in forest tree breeding due to the relative temporal and financial efficiency of the approach. The trade-off is the lower precision of the estimated genetic parameters. Pedigree/sib-ship reconstruction has been proven as a tool to correct and complete pedigree information and to improve the precision of genetic parameter estimates. Our study analyzed an advanced generation Eucalyptus population from an OP breeding program using single-step genetic evaluation. The relationship matrix inferred from sib-ship reconstruction was used to rescale the marker-based relationship matrix (G matrix). This was compared with a second scenario that used rescaling based on the documented pedigree. The proposed single-step model performed better with respect to both model fit and the theoretical accuracy of breeding values. We found that the prediction accuracy was superior when using the pedigree information only when compared with using a combination of the pedigree and genomic information. This pattern appeared to be mainly a result of accumulated unrecognized relatedness over several breeding cycles, resulting in breeding values being shrunk toward the population mean. Using biased, pedigree-based breeding values as the base with which to correlate predicted GEBVs, resulted in the underestimation of prediction accuracies. Using breeding values estimated on the basis of sib-ship reconstruction resulted in increased prediction accuracies of the genotyped individuals. Therefore, selection of the correct base for estimation of prediction accuracy is critical. The beneficial impact of sib-ship reconstruction using G matrix rescaling was profound, especially in traits with inbreeding depression, such as stem diameter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.