ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2019
Production of Tissue-Engineered Small Intestine in Rats with Different Ages of Cell Donors.
Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Current applications of intestinal organoids: a review.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
- A Comparison of Sterilization Techniques for Production of Decellularized Intestine in Mice.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2020Article
- Gut bioengineering promotes gut repair and pharmaceutical research: a review.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
impact statementThis study compared side-by-side the impact of donor age on the production of tissue-engineered small intestine (TESI). Each age represents a specific period of life: E18 for fetuses, 5-day-old pups for neonates, 21-day-old rats for weanlings, and 6-week-old rats for adults. The TESI produced was compared macroscopically and microscopically. The mechanism(s) contributing to the differences observed was explored by detecting proliferating cells in the TESI and by analyzing intestinal stem cell gene expression in donor cells. These data may provide valuable information for future application of TESI clinically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.