Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30284583›Full record

Observational studySaudi medical journal2018

Evaluation of the perfusion index according to the visual analog scale in postoperative patients.

Hakan Tapar, Mustafa Suren, Serkan Karaman, Serkan Dogru, Tugba Karaman, Aynur Sahin, Fatih Altıparmak

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Saudi medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hakan TaparDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Medical Faculty, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey. E-mail. hakantapar@hotmail.com.
Mustafa Suren
Serkan Karaman
Serkan Dogru
Tugba Karaman
Aynur Sahin
Fatih Altıparmak
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the possible value of the perfusion index (PI) as a tool for pain assessment. Methods: This prospective, observational study was performed with 89 patients underwent surgery with general anesthesia. The patients with visual analog scale (VAS) greater than 3 were grouped as M1, and patients with VAS≤3 and performed morphine were grouped as M2. After surgery patients with VAS greater than 3 were given 2mg morphine. Patients with VAS greater than 3 were given increments of intravenous morphine (2 mg) at 20 minute intervals until VAS less than 3. The correlation and difference between PI and VAS score values were evaluated before and after analgesic administration. Results: Significant changes were found in both PI values and VAS scores between M1 and M2 groups (2.80±0.77, 3.97±0.94, p less than 0.001; 6.60±1.20, 2.74±0.46, p less than 0.001) Despite no correlation was found between PI values and VAS scores of M1 and M2 groups, weak negative correlation was detected between differences in PI values and VAS scores among groups (r=-0.255, p=0.016). Conclusion: Perfusion index is a parameter that can be used in the assessment of postoperative pain and responses to analgesics.

Indexed as

Blood Flow VelocityVisual Analog ScaleAdultAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthesia, GeneralFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorphineOximetryPostoperative PainProspective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidMorphine

Identifiers

PMID30284583
PMCPMC6201022
OpenAlexW2897631635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.