ReviewSaudi medical journal2018
Review of surgical resection and reconstruction in head and neck cancer. Traditional versus current concepts.
Review in Saudi medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Model experiments on application of oral and maxillofacial surgical robot-assisted mandibular tumor resection and reconstruction.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Exploring Salvage Techniques in Venous Compromise of Fibular Free Flap: A Case Report of End-to-End Anastomosis with the Internal Jugular Vein.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2025Article
- Current innovations in head and neck cancer: From diagnostics to therapeutics.Oncology research · 2025Review
- Perspectives in Using Multiple Flaps Reconstructions for Advanced Head and Neck Tumors (Scoping Review).Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Challenges during implant-assisted prosthetic rehabilitation in fibula reconstructed jaws and its management: a scoping review protocol.International journal of surgery protocols · 2024Article
- Role of Cannabinoids in Oral Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Current Approaches to Salvage Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- Reconstruction of Head and Neck Region with Supraclavicular Artery Flap.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022Article
- Quality of Life and Aesthetic Satisfaction in Patients Who Underwent the "Commando Operation" with Pectoralis Major Myocutaneus Flap Reconstruction-A Case Series Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Modified Technique of Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap Inset for Buccal Mucosa Reconstruction.World journal of plastic surgery · 2022Article
- Hypopharyngeal Reconstruction: Possibilities, Outcomes, and Updates for Improving the Human Health for Quality of Life.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Review
- Multiple Free Flap Reconstruction of a Complex Intraoral Defect after Squamous Cell Carcinoma Excision: A Case Report.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- The need for craniofacial trauma and oncologic reconstruction in global surgery.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review summarizes the development of head and neck cancer resection and reconstruction. The developments in the treatment of cancer patients are reflected in their surgical outcomes, in addition to functional and aesthetic improvements. New technologies, such as surgical simulation and planning, minimally invasive surgery, and microsurgery have been added to the field to improve surgical resection of the tumor and reconstruction. The field is still growing to optimize the management of head and neck cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.