Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30284182›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2019

Test-retest reliability and validity of a single-item Self-reported Family Happiness Scale in Hong Kong Chinese: findings from Hong Kong Jockey Club FAMILY Project.

Chen Shen, Man Ping Wang, Henry C Y Ho, Alice Wan, Sunita M Stewart, Kasisomayajula Viswanath, Sophia Siu Chee Chan, Tai Hing Lam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Promoting Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Parents: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Chen ShenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Man Ping WangSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China. mpwang@hku.hk.
Henry C Y HoDepartment of Psychology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Alice WanSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Sunita M StewartDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Kasisomayajula ViswanathCenter for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Sophia Siu Chee ChanSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Tai Hing LamSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
University of Hong Kong · HKDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USEducation University of Hong Kong · HKThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFamily happiness is one major theme of family well-being in Chinese culture. We investigated the reliability and validity of the single-item Self-reported Family Happiness Scale (SFHS-1) with the score of 0-10, based on two studies in Hong Kong Chinese.

methodsStudy 1 was a territory-wide population-based telephone survey (n = 4038) conducted in 2016. Study 2 was a community-based family intervention program conducted during 2012-2013 (n = 1261) to enhance family communication and well-being. Test-retest reliability of the SFHS-1 was assessed over 1 month in Study 2. Family APGAR (Adaption, Partnership, Growth, Affection, Resolve) Scale, Family Communication Scale, Subjective Happiness Scale, 12-item Short Form Health Survey Version 2, and 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire were used to assess the convergent and discriminant validities of the SFHS-1 in both studies. Multiple regression analysis was used to assess the incremental validity by identifying the additional contribution of the SFHS-1 score in predicting subjective happiness.

resultsThe 1-month test-retest reliability assessed by intraclass correlation was 0.76. Family happiness was moderately to strongly correlated with family function, family communication, subjective happiness, mental health-related quality of life and depression, but weakly correlated with physical health-related quality of life. Furthermore, the score of the SFHS-1 added predictive power to mental health-related quality of life and depression in assessing subjective happiness.

conclusionsOur results have shown the SFHS-1 as a reliable and valid measurement of family happiness in Hong Kong Chinese, suggesting SFHS-1 is highly practicable for future large epidemiological and community-based intervention studies.

Indexed as

HappinessAdolescentAdultAgedAsian PeopleFemaleHealth SurveysHong KongHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultFamily happinessQuality of lifeReliabilitySingle-item scaleValidity

Identifiers

PMID30284182
OpenAlexW2895251459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.