Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30284125›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2019

Vaccine coverage of children in care of the child welfare system.

Jennifer S Hermann, Kimberley A Simmonds, Christopher A Bell, Ellen Rafferty, Shannon E MacDonald

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Immunization status of children at kindergarten entry in Alberta, Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer S HermannFaculty of Nursing, Level 3, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405-87 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Kimberley A SimmondsSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Christopher A BellAnalytics and Performance Reporting Branch, Alberta Health, Edmonton, Canada.
Ellen RaffertyFaculty of Nursing, Level 3, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405-87 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Shannon E MacDonaldFaculty of Nursing, Level 3, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405-87 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada. smacdon@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4675-4433
University of Alberta · CAAlberta Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess vaccine coverage for a cohort of children who have been in the care of the child welfare system compared to children in the general population.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study used population-based administrative health data for a 2008 birth cohort of children from Alberta, Canada. We assessed coverage at ages 2 (n = 44,206) and 7 (n = 42,241) for three vaccines with different administration schedules for children in care (at any period before the age of assessment) and those who had never been in care, comparing them using risk differences and relative risks (RRs). We similarly assessed coverage for children not in care who shared characteristics of children in care.

resultsAt age two, vaccination coverage for children in care ranged from 54.3% to 81.4%, depending on vaccine. In comparison, coverage for those not in care ranged from 74.2% to 87.4%. At age seven, coverage for children in care ranged from 53.1% to 65.3%, compared to 76.6% to 83.4% for those not in care. For all vaccines at both ages, the risk for being under-vaccinated was higher for children in care (e.g., diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio, Haemophilus influenzae type b at age 7: RR 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] (1.74-2.32). Even for children not in care who had characteristics similar to children in care, we found children in care had lower coverage.

conclusionChildren in care have consistently lower vaccine coverage than children not in care. Policies and practices should promote optimal access to vaccination for these children.

Indexed as

AlbertaChildChild, PreschoolChild WelfareFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesVaccination CoverageVaccinesVaccinesChild protective servicesChild welfareCoverageImmunizationVaccinationVaccine

Identifiers

PMID30284125
PMCPMC6964484
OpenAlexW2895085993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.