ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2019
A cost of musical training? Sensorimotor flexibility in musical sequence learning.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Musical training increases anticipatory responding and predictive control in sequence learning.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Divergent effects of pitch feedback on online and offline motor sequence learning.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- Focus of attention in musical learning and music performance: a systematic review and discussion of focus instructions and outcome measures.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- The Generation of Piano Music Using Deep Learning Aided by Robotic Technology.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Generalization of novel sensorimotor associations among pianists and non-pianists: more evidence that musical training effects are constrained.Psychological research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We report an experiment that tested the flexibility of sensorimotor learning in sequence production. Nonpianists and pianists learned simple melodies by ear under one of two auditory feedback conditions: one with normal pitch mapping (higher pitches to the right) and one with an inverted (reversed) mapping. After learning, both groups played melodies from memory while experiencing each feedback condition. Both groups exhibited sensorimotor learning and produced fewer errors at test while hearing the feedback used during training as opposed to the alternate feedback condition. However, learning was unstable for pianists who learned melodies with an inverted feedback condition, who produced more errors at test than pianists who learned melodies with normal-pitch mapping. Acquiring musical skill may therefore constrain subsequent sensorimotor flexibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30284115What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.