Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30284078›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2019

Prevalence of fibromyalgia in physicians in training: a cross-sectional study.

Mohammed A Omair, Sarah Alobud, Muneera H Al-Bogami, Rufaidah Dabbagh, Yasmeen K Altaymani, Nour Alsultan, Abeer Alhazzani, Maha A Omair

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammed A OmairDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. momair@ksu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9373-5473
Sarah AlobudDepartment of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Muneera H Al-BogamiDepartment of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rufaidah DabbaghCommunity Medicine Unit, Department of Family and Community Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yasmeen K AltaymaniDepartment of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nour AlsultanDepartment of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abeer AlhazzaniDepartment of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Maha A OmairDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, College of Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of fibromyalgia (FM) in physicians in training (PIT) in Saudi Arabia is unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of FM in PIT using different screening tools and factors associated with its development. We also aimed at evaluating the level of agreement and correlation between screening tools. This was a cross-sectional study conducted in a single academic institution. PIT were invited to fill three questionnaires: Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening tool (FirST), Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire (FSQ), and London Fibromyalgia Epidemiology Study Screening Questionnaire (LFESSQ). A total of 182 PIT completed the questionnaire. They were predominantly males (57.1%), single (56.0%), and at resident level (86.7%). The median age was 28 (interquartile range = 4). The average number of house-calls/month was 3.2 (SD = 2.3). The prevalence of FM using the FirST, FSQ, and LFESSQ was 6.0%, 8.2%, and 11.6%, respectively. Six (3.3%) fulfilled the three criteria concurrently. After adjusting for different variables using the FSQ, PIT with family history of FM had 23.6 times the odds for testing positive (95% CI = 3.12, 178.37), and every extra house-call/month was associated with a 50% increase in the odds for testing positive for FM (95% CI = 1.00, 2.25). Percent agreement between tools was high (all > 86%). Results for kappa coefficient showed moderate agreement between FSQ scores and each of FirST and LFESSQ. There was poor agreement between FirST and LFESSQ. FM is prevalent among PIT. There is a high percent agreement and poor to moderate correlation between the screening tools used.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFibromyalgiaHumansInternship and ResidencyLogistic ModelsMaleMass ScreeningPhysiciansPrevalenceSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultFibromyalgiaPhysician in trainingPrevalence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.