SynthesisJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2018
Correlation between MCP-1-2518A/G polymorphism and the risk of Alzheimer's disease.
Synthesis in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1/CCL2 is a promoter of breast cancer metastasis.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2023Review
- The Role of CCL2/CCR2 Axis in Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Treatment: From Animal Experiments to Clinical Trials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Genetic Variants, Circulating Level of MCP1 with Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Case-Control Study.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The -2518A/G polymorphism in monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) has been extensively investigated for association with Alzheimer's disease (AD); however, the results from different studies are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to draw an accurate conclusion of the association. All eligible case-control studies were searched in PubMed, Embase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biological Medicine Databases, and Wanfang Databases. Eight case-control studies with a total of 2370 cases and 2413 controls were eligible to be included in this meta-analysis. The association was evaluated by calculating the odds ratios (ORs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall, there was no significant association between MCP-1-2518A/G polymorphism and AD risk in all genetic models (the allele model G vs. A: OR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.92-1.45, p = 0.22; the co-dominant model GG vs. AA: OR = 1.38, 95% CI 0.80-2.36, p = 0.25; the dominant model AG + GG vs. AA: OR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.89-1.46, p = 0.31; the recessive model GG vs. AG + AA: OR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.87-2.09, p = 0.18). In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, a significant difference was not detected in both Caucasians and Asians. In allele model (G vs. A), the required sample size of 31858 was calculated by applying trial sequential analysis. Cumulative z curve is always below the trial sequential monitoring boundary and is nominally statistically significant (Z = 1.96). A consistent result was obtained in other genetic models. In summary, the present meta-analysis suggests that MCP-1-2518A/G polymorphism may not be associated with genetic susceptibility of AD in general population, but the association remains indeterminate due to the insufficient evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.