Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30284063›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2018

Droplet digital PCR using HER2/EIF2C1 ratio for detection of HER2 amplification in breast cancer tissues.

Anchalee Tantiwetrueangdet, Ravat Panvichian, Sansanee Wongwaisayawan, Natthaporn Sueangoen, Panuwat Lertsithichai

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Omics-Based Investigations of Breast Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anchalee TantiwetrueangdetResearch Center, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ravat PanvichianDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Rama 6 Road, Rajthevi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. ravat.pan@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5282-8166
Sansanee WongwaisayawanDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natthaporn SueangoenResearch Center, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Panuwat LertsithichaiDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancers with amplification and overexpression of human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are associated with poor prognosis, and targeted for anti-HER2 therapy. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are currently the recommended methods to asses HER2 overexpression/amplification. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), a highly accurate method to quantify DNA copy number, is potentially a robust alternative for HER2 diagnostics. In the FISH assay and most of previous ddPCR reports, chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) has been used as the reference control to determine HER2/CEP17 ratio. Nevertheless, miss-classification could occur when HER2 is co-amplified with CEP17. To avoid this inherent defect, in the present study, we employed ddPCR assay using the human eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2C1 (EIF2C1) gene located at chromosome 1p34.3 as the reference control to quantify HER2 copy number in 31 frozen breast cancer tissues. HER2 status of these samples had been determined by FISH and classified as HER2-amplified and HER2-non-amplified breast cancers. The results showed that HER2 determined by ddPCR using HER2/EIF2C1 ratio was in good concordance with HER2 determined by FISH using HER2/CEP17 ratio, the concordance rate 87.1% (27/31), Kappa  = 0.719. The sensitivity and specificity of ddPCR assay was 90% (9/10) and 85.7% (18/21), respectively. The median HER2/EIF2C1 copy number ratio in HER2-amplified cancers (6.55, range 1.3-17.3) was significantly higher than in HER2-non-amplified cancers (1.05, range 0.6-3.6, p < 0.001). This study demonstrated that ddPCR using HER2/EIF2C1 ratio could accurately assess HER2 status in frozen breast cancer tissues. Thus, our findings warrant further studies into breast cancer with HER2-equivocal by IHC/FISH.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationArgonaute ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEukaryotic Initiation FactorsFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionPrognosisAGO1 protein, humanArgonaute ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEukaryotic Initiation FactorsddPCREIF2C1FISHHER2IHC

Identifiers

PMID30284063
PMCPMC6182624
OpenAlexW2894826497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.